CLCG vs. HLAL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CLCG (Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF) and HLAL (Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. CLCG is actively managed, while HLAL is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

CLCG vs. HLAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF (CLCG) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLCG achieves a 9.02% return, which is significantly lower than HLAL's 18.08% return.

CLCG

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 5.58%
• YTD: 9.02%
• 6M: 8.51%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HLAL

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: 7.05%
• YTD: 18.08%
• 6M: 17.15%
• 1Y: 42.63%
• 3Y*: 21.88%
• 5Y*: 15.73%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLCG vs. HLAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CLCG Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF	9.02%	7.85%
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF	18.08%	13.31%

Correlation

The correlation between CLCG and HLAL is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.84

Return for Risk

CLCG vs. HLAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLAL

HLAL Risk / Return Rank: 89
HLAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
HLAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
HLAL Omega Ratio Rank: 90
HLAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
HLAL Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLCG vs. HLAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF (CLCG) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLCG	HLAL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.25	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.90	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.21	0.89	+0.32

Drawdowns

CLCG vs. HLAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLCG drawdown since its inception was -16.32%, smaller than the maximum HLAL drawdown of -33.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLCG and HLAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLCG	HLAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.32%	-33.57%	+17.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.20%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.67%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.21%	-0.61%	-0.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.83%	-5.00%	+1.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.20%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CLCG	HLAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.59%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.97%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.06%	13.19%	+3.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.06%	17.60%	-0.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.06%	20.21%	-3.15%

CLCG vs. HLAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CLCG and HLAL have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

CLCG vs. HLAL - Dividend Comparison

CLCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than HLAL's 0.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CLCG Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF	0.06%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF	0.45%	0.53%	0.58%	0.72%	1.15%	0.78%	0.97%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLCG and HLAL in my portfolio?

CLCG and HLAL have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CLCG or HLAL?

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLCG or HLAL?

CLCG and HLAL have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLCG or HLAL?

HLAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.06% for CLCG.

What is the main difference between CLCG and HLAL?

They also come from different issuers: Crossmark and Wahed.