CL=F vs. DAX
CL=F (Crude Oil WTI) is an asset, while DAX (Global X DAX Germany ETF) is Europe Equities fund tracking the DAX Index. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
CL=F vs. DAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CL=F
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DAX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- -2.02%
- 6M
- 0.86%
- 1Y
- 1.43%
- 3Y*
- 17.37%
- 5Y*
- 7.56%
- 10Y*
- 9.21%
CL=F vs. DAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL=F Crude Oil WTI | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 17.82% |
DAX Global X DAX Germany ETF | -2.02% | 39.00% | 10.55% | 23.62% | -15.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between CL=F and DAX is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2022 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CL=F vs. DAX — Risk / Return Rank
CL=F
DAX
CL=F vs. DAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crude Oil WTI (CL=F) and Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CL=F | DAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.34 | — |
Drawdowns
CL=F vs. DAX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CL=F | DAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -45.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -5.93% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -10.50% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.71% | — |
Volatility
CL=F vs. DAX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CL=F | DAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.30% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.59% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 17.86% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 20.41% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 21.28% | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
CL=F and DAX have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CL=F and DAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer