CL vs. JPM
CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company) and JPM (JPMorgan Chase & Co.) are both stocks. CL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while JPM operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, CL returned 4.55%/yr vs 21.27%/yr for JPM. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CL vs. JPM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CL achieves a 18.45% return, which is significantly higher than JPM's 6.66% return. Over the past 10 years, CL has underperformed JPM with an annualized return of 4.55%, while JPM has yielded a comparatively higher 21.27% annualized return.
CL
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 3.33%
- 6M
- 10.74%
- YTD
- 18.45%
- 1Y
- 8.51%
- 3Y*
- 8.51%
- 5Y*
- 4.73%
- 10Y*
- 4.55%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.30%
JPM
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 4.67%
- 6M
- 9.49%
- YTD
- 6.66%
- 1Y
- 18.57%
- 3Y*
- 32.69%
- 5Y*
- 20.23%
- 10Y*
- 21.27%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.35%
CL vs. JPM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 18.45% | -10.98% | 16.57% | 3.78% | -5.44% | 2.08% | 27.17% | 18.60% | -19.19% | 17.88% |
JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 6.66% | 37.27% | 44.29% | 30.63% | -12.64% | 27.75% | -5.53% | 47.26% | -6.62% | 26.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between CL and JPM is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1983 | 0.27 |
The correlation between CL and JPM shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CL:
$73.56B
JPM:
$908.01B
CL:
$2.59
JPM:
$23.29
CL:
35.53
JPM:
14.55
CL:
9.18
JPM:
1.61
CL:
3.57
JPM:
3.18
CL:
510.43
JPM:
2.68
CL:
$20.80B
JPM:
$297.63B
CL:
$12.49B
JPM:
$186.33B
CL:
$3.92B
JPM:
$90.84B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CL vs. JPM — Risk / Return Rank
CL
JPM
CL vs. JPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CL | JPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.16 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 1.21 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.90 | 2.85 | -1.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CL vs. JPM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CL drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, smaller than the maximum JPM drawdown of -76.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL and JPM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CL | JPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.91% | -76.16% | +17.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.97% | -15.47% | -1.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.05% | -24.42% | -4.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.05% | -38.77% | +9.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.05% | -43.63% | +14.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.42% | -2.32% | -9.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.24% | -17.58% | +6.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.45% | 6.53% | +2.92% |
Volatility
CL vs. JPM - Volatility Comparison
Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) has a higher volatility of 7.69% compared to JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) at 6.42%. This indicates that CL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CL | JPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.69% | 6.42% | +1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.58% | 16.66% | +0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.48% | 22.17% | +0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 24.41% | -5.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.86% | 27.31% | -7.45% |
Dividends
CL vs. JPM - Dividend Comparison
CL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than JPM's 1.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.28% | 2.61% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% |
JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 1.77% | 1.72% | 1.92% | 2.38% | 2.98% | 2.34% | 2.83% | 2.37% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.13% | 2.54% |
Financials
CL vs. JPM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Colgate-Palmolive Company and JPMorgan Chase & Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CL vs. JPM - Profitability Comparison
CL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a gross profit of 3.23B and revenue of 5.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.
JPM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported a gross profit of 54.83B and revenue of 82.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.5%.
CL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.7%.
JPM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported an operating income of 27.52B and revenue of 82.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.4%.
CL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a net income of 646.00M and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
JPM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported a net income of 21.16B and revenue of 82.46B, resulting in a net margin of 25.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CL and JPM have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CL has higher volatility (7.69%) compared to JPM (6.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CL dropped -58.91% vs JPM's -76.16%.
JPM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CL and JPM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer