CL vs. CELH
CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company) and CELH (Celsius Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — CL in Household & Personal Products, CELH in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic. Over the past 10 years, CL returned 4.84%/yr vs 42.26%/yr for CELH. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CL vs. CELH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CL achieves a 16.05% return, which is significantly higher than CELH's -37.17% return. Over the past 10 years, CL has underperformed CELH with an annualized return of 4.84%, while CELH has yielded a comparatively higher 42.26% annualized return.
CL
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 16.05%
- 6M
- 15.45%
- 1Y
- 2.89%
- 3Y*
- 7.73%
- 5Y*
- 4.48%
- 10Y*
- 4.84%
CELH
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- -4.71%
- YTD
- -37.17%
- 6M
- -34.39%
- 1Y
- -30.17%
- 3Y*
- -15.80%
- 5Y*
- 6.47%
- 10Y*
- 42.26%
CL vs. CELH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 16.05% | -10.98% | 16.57% | 3.78% | -5.44% | 2.08% | 27.17% | 18.60% | -19.19% | 17.88% |
CELH Celsius Holdings, Inc. | -37.17% | 73.65% | -51.69% | 57.21% | 39.52% | 48.22% | 941.61% | 39.19% | -33.90% | 114.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between CL and CELH is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.10 |
Fundamentals
CL:
$72.93B
CELH:
$7.47B
CL:
$2.58
CELH:
$0.61
CL:
35.12
CELH:
46.94
CL:
9.07
CELH:
0.05
CL:
3.52
CELH:
2.35
CL:
502.94
CELH:
18.74
CL:
$20.80B
CELH:
$2.97B
CL:
$12.49B
CELH:
$1.47B
CL:
$3.92B
CELH:
$274.27M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CL vs. CELH — Risk / Return Rank
CL
CELH
CL vs. CELH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CL | CELH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.94 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | -0.53 | +0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.26 | -0.99 | +1.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CL vs. CELH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CL drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, smaller than the maximum CELH drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL and CELH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CL | CELH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.91% | -77.86% | +18.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.64% | -57.22% | +38.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.05% | -77.86% | +48.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.05% | -77.86% | +48.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.05% | -77.86% | +48.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.22% | -70.10% | +56.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.24% | -27.93% | +16.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.33% | 30.38% | -19.05% |
Volatility
CL vs. CELH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) is 8.34%, while Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) has a volatility of 15.97%. This indicates that CL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CELH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CL | CELH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.34% | 15.97% | -7.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.30% | 37.08% | -19.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.65% | 56.49% | -34.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.82% | 65.30% | -46.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.76% | 68.93% | -49.17% |
Dividends
CL vs. CELH - Dividend Comparison
CL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, while CELH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CELH Celsius Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.31% | 2.61% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% |
Financials
CL vs. CELH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Colgate-Palmolive Company and Celsius Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CL vs. CELH - Profitability Comparison
CL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a gross profit of 3.23B and revenue of 5.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.
CELH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celsius Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 378.07M and revenue of 782.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.3%.
CL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.7%.
CELH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celsius Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 138.99M and revenue of 782.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.8%.
CL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a net income of 646.00M and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
CELH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celsius Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 85.08M and revenue of 782.62M, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CL and CELH have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CELH has higher volatility (15.97%) compared to CL (8.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CL dropped -58.91% vs CELH's -77.86%.
CL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.13 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CL and CELH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer