PortfoliosLab logo
CELH vs. MNST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CELH and MNST is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.2

Performance

CELH vs. MNST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%500.00%1,000.00%1,500.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
68.32%
1,695.45%
CELH
MNST

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CELH:

-0.75

MNST:

0.45

Sortino Ratio

CELH:

-1.09

MNST:

0.75

Omega Ratio

CELH:

0.88

MNST:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

CELH:

-0.65

MNST:

0.44

Martin Ratio

CELH:

-0.83

MNST:

1.34

Ulcer Index

CELH:

60.52%

MNST:

8.54%

Daily Std Dev

CELH:

67.38%

MNST:

25.45%

Max Drawdown

CELH:

-99.79%

MNST:

-69.17%

Current Drawdown

CELH:

-63.10%

MNST:

-2.63%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CELH:

$9.59B

MNST:

$56.92B

EPS

CELH:

$0.44

MNST:

$1.49

PE Ratio

CELH:

81.66

MNST:

39.26

PEG Ratio

CELH:

1.09

MNST:

2.09

PS Ratio

CELH:

7.07

MNST:

7.60

PB Ratio

CELH:

23.16

MNST:

9.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

CELH:

$999.92M

MNST:

$5.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CELH:

$498.00M

MNST:

$3.02B

EBITDA (TTM)

CELH:

$78.58M

MNST:

$1.46B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CELH achieves a 34.62% return, which is significantly higher than MNST's 12.73% return. Over the past 10 years, CELH has outperformed MNST with an annualized return of 42.79%, while MNST has yielded a comparatively lower 9.71% annualized return.


CELH

YTD

34.62%

1M

5.38%

6M

14.28%

1Y

-51.91%

5Y*

84.62%

10Y*

42.79%

MNST

YTD

12.73%

1M

2.40%

6M

12.90%

1Y

9.46%

5Y*

13.96%

10Y*

9.71%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CELH vs. MNST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CELH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CELH is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CELH is 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CELH is 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CELH is 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CELH is 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CELH is 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

MNST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MNST is 6666
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MNST is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MNST is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MNST is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MNST is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MNST is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CELH vs. MNST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for CELH, currently valued at -0.75, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
CELH: -0.75
MNST: 0.45
The chart of Sortino ratio for CELH, currently valued at -1.09, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
CELH: -1.09
MNST: 0.75
The chart of Omega ratio for CELH, currently valued at 0.88, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
CELH: 0.88
MNST: 1.11
The chart of Calmar ratio for CELH, currently valued at -0.65, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
CELH: -0.65
MNST: 0.44
The chart of Martin ratio for CELH, currently valued at -0.83, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
CELH: -0.83
MNST: 1.34

The current CELH Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is lower than the MNST Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CELH and MNST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.75
0.45
CELH
MNST

Dividends

CELH vs. MNST - Dividend Comparison

Neither CELH nor MNST has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CELH vs. MNST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CELH drawdown since its inception was -99.79%, which is greater than MNST's maximum drawdown of -69.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CELH and MNST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-63.10%
-2.63%
CELH
MNST

Volatility

CELH vs. MNST - Volatility Comparison

Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) has a higher volatility of 14.85% compared to Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) at 9.16%. This indicates that CELH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
14.85%
9.16%
CELH
MNST

Financials

CELH vs. MNST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celsius Holdings, Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00BAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
332.20M
1.81B
(CELH) Total Revenue
(MNST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CELH vs. MNST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Celsius Holdings, Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%AprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
50.2%
55.3%
(CELH) Gross Margin
(MNST) Gross Margin
CELH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celsius Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 166.67M and revenue of 332.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.2%.
MNST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.00B and revenue of 1.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.3%.
CELH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celsius Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -18.50M and revenue of 332.20M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.6%.
MNST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Monster Beverage Corporation reported an operating income of 381.22M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.
CELH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celsius Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -18.88M and revenue of 332.20M, resulting in a net margin of -5.7%.
MNST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a net income of 270.71M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.