PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CELH vs. MNST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CELHMNST
YTD Return74.52%-8.52%
1Y Return121.09%-8.08%
3Y Return (Ann)65.95%4.25%
5Y Return (Ann)133.23%10.70%
10Y Return (Ann)82.50%16.52%
Sharpe Ratio2.07-0.40
Daily Std Dev56.55%21.03%
Max Drawdown-99.79%-96.53%
Current Drawdown-1.00%-13.39%

Fundamentals


CELHMNST
Market Cap$21.68B$56.72B
EPS$0.91$1.58
PE Ratio102.2234.25
PEG Ratio2.471.90
Revenue (TTM)$1.41B$7.34B
Gross Profit (TTM)$270.87M$3.17B
EBITDA (TTM)$308.55M$2.14B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between CELH and MNST is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CELH vs. MNST - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CELH achieves a 74.52% return, which is significantly higher than MNST's -8.52% return. Over the past 10 years, CELH has outperformed MNST with an annualized return of 82.50%, while MNST has yielded a comparatively lower 16.52% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%20,000.00%40,000.00%60,000.00%80,000.00%100,000.00%120,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
114,125.69%
2,004.46%
CELH
MNST

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Celsius Holdings, Inc.

Monster Beverage Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CELH vs. MNST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CELH
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CELH, currently valued at 2.07, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.002.07
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CELH, currently valued at 2.83, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.83
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CELH, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.35
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CELH, currently valued at 4.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.13
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CELH, currently valued at 7.60, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.007.60
MNST
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MNST, currently valued at -0.40, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.40
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MNST, currently valued at -0.46, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.46
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MNST, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.95
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MNST, currently valued at -0.41, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.41
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MNST, currently valued at -1.06, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-1.06

CELH vs. MNST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CELH Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the MNST Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CELH and MNST.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
2.07
-0.40
CELH
MNST

Dividends

CELH vs. MNST - Dividend Comparison

Neither CELH nor MNST has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CELH vs. MNST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CELH drawdown since its inception was -99.79%, roughly equal to the maximum MNST drawdown of -96.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CELH and MNST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-1.00%
-13.39%
CELH
MNST

Volatility

CELH vs. MNST - Volatility Comparison

Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) has a higher volatility of 12.06% compared to Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) at 4.94%. This indicates that CELH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
12.06%
4.94%
CELH
MNST

Financials

CELH vs. MNST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celsius Holdings, Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items