CELH vs. MNST
CELH (Celsius Holdings, Inc.) and MNST (Monster Beverage Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Beverages - Non-Alcoholic industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. Over the past 10 years, CELH returned 42.93%/yr vs 13.33%/yr for MNST. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CELH vs. MNST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CELH achieves a -34.39% return, which is significantly lower than MNST's 16.13% return. Over the past 10 years, CELH has outperformed MNST with an annualized return of 42.93%, while MNST has yielded a comparatively lower 13.33% annualized return.
CELH
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- -10.60%
- YTD
- -34.39%
- 6M
- -28.55%
- 1Y
- -23.40%
- 3Y*
- -13.31%
- 5Y*
- 2.88%
- 10Y*
- 42.93%
MNST
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 18.40%
- YTD
- 16.13%
- 6M
- 20.35%
- 1Y
- 39.15%
- 3Y*
- 14.39%
- 5Y*
- 13.30%
- 10Y*
- 13.33%
CELH vs. MNST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CELH Celsius Holdings, Inc. | -34.39% | 73.65% | -51.69% | 57.21% | 39.52% | 48.22% | 941.61% | 39.19% | -33.90% | 114.29% |
MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | 16.13% | 45.87% | -8.77% | 13.48% | 5.72% | 3.85% | 45.52% | 29.11% | -22.23% | 42.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between CELH and MNST is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016 | 0.29 |
The correlation between CELH and MNST shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CELH:
$7.80B
MNST:
$87.99B
CELH:
$0.61
MNST:
$2.06
CELH:
49.02
MNST:
43.21
CELH:
0.05
MNST:
3.38
CELH:
2.45
MNST:
9.98
CELH:
19.57
MNST:
10.08
CELH:
$2.97B
MNST:
$8.79B
CELH:
$1.47B
MNST:
$4.88B
CELH:
$274.27M
MNST:
$2.70B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CELH vs. MNST — Risk / Return Rank
CELH
MNST
CELH vs. MNST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CELH | MNST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.30 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | 2.22 | -2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.82 | 6.31 | -7.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CELH | MNST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.42 | 1.49 | -1.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.54 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.51 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.60 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
CELH vs. MNST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CELH drawdown since its inception was -77.86%, which is greater than MNST's maximum drawdown of -69.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CELH and MNST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CELH | MNST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.86% | -69.17% | -8.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.05% | -17.70% | -39.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.86% | -26.04% | -51.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.86% | -26.62% | -51.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.86% | -30.42% | -47.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.78% | -0.22% | -68.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.81% | -20.68% | -7.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.67% | 6.25% | +22.42% |
Volatility
CELH vs. MNST - Volatility Comparison
Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) has a higher volatility of 18.17% compared to Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) at 13.66%. This indicates that CELH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CELH | MNST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.17% | 13.66% | +4.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.10% | 19.99% | +17.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.10% | 26.34% | +29.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.87% | 24.59% | +41.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.91% | 26.25% | +42.66% |
Dividends
CELH vs. MNST - Dividend Comparison
Neither CELH nor MNST has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CELH vs. MNST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celsius Holdings, Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CELH vs. MNST - Profitability Comparison
CELH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celsius Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 378.07M and revenue of 782.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.3%.
MNST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.29B and revenue of 2.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.0%.
CELH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celsius Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 138.99M and revenue of 782.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.8%.
MNST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported an operating income of 729.96M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.0%.
CELH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celsius Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 85.08M and revenue of 782.62M, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.
MNST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a net income of 569.49M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in a net margin of 24.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CELH and MNST have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CELH has higher volatility (18.17%) compared to MNST (13.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CELH dropped -77.86% vs MNST's -69.17%.
MNST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CELH and MNST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer