PortfoliosLab logo
CELH vs. MNST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CELH and MNST is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CELH vs. MNST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CELH:

-0.92

MNST:

0.87

Sortino Ratio

CELH:

-1.58

MNST:

1.19

Omega Ratio

CELH:

0.83

MNST:

1.18

Calmar Ratio

CELH:

-0.78

MNST:

0.81

Martin Ratio

CELH:

-0.97

MNST:

3.16

Ulcer Index

CELH:

62.52%

MNST:

6.65%

Daily Std Dev

CELH:

66.99%

MNST:

25.51%

Max Drawdown

CELH:

-99.79%

MNST:

-69.17%

Current Drawdown

CELH:

-61.46%

MNST:

0.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CELH:

$9.30B

MNST:

$62.65B

EPS

CELH:

$0.33

MNST:

$1.54

PE Ratio

CELH:

109.39

MNST:

41.71

PEG Ratio

CELH:

1.15

MNST:

2.09

PS Ratio

CELH:

7.00

MNST:

8.41

PB Ratio

CELH:

21.00

MNST:

9.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

CELH:

$1.33B

MNST:

$7.45B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CELH:

$670.37M

MNST:

$4.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

CELH:

$130.61M

MNST:

$2.02B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CELH achieves a 40.62% return, which is significantly higher than MNST's 22.22% return. Over the past 10 years, CELH has outperformed MNST with an annualized return of 47.31%, while MNST has yielded a comparatively lower 11.72% annualized return.


CELH

YTD

40.62%

1M

0.82%

6M

34.20%

1Y

-61.07%

3Y*

16.18%

5Y*

66.48%

10Y*

47.31%

MNST

YTD

22.22%

1M

9.49%

6M

17.16%

1Y

21.90%

3Y*

12.74%

5Y*

12.64%

10Y*

11.72%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Celsius Holdings, Inc.

Monster Beverage Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CELH vs. MNST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CELH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CELH is 1111
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CELH is 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CELH is 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CELH is 88
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CELH is 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CELH is 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

MNST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MNST is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MNST is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MNST is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MNST is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MNST is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MNST is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CELH vs. MNST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CELH Sharpe Ratio is -0.92, which is lower than the MNST Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CELH and MNST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CELH vs. MNST - Dividend Comparison

Neither CELH nor MNST has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CELH vs. MNST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CELH drawdown since its inception was -99.79%, which is greater than MNST's maximum drawdown of -69.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CELH and MNST.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CELH vs. MNST - Volatility Comparison

Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) has a higher volatility of 11.51% compared to Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) at 4.89%. This indicates that CELH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CELH vs. MNST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celsius Holdings, Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20212022202320242025
329.28M
1.85B
(CELH) Total Revenue
(MNST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CELH vs. MNST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Celsius Holdings, Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
52.4%
56.5%
(CELH) Gross Margin
(MNST) Gross Margin
CELH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celsius Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 172.37M and revenue of 329.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.4%.

MNST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.05B and revenue of 1.85B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.5%.

CELH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celsius Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 52.03M and revenue of 329.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.8%.

MNST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Monster Beverage Corporation reported an operating income of 569.75M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.7%.

CELH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celsius Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 77.57M and revenue of 329.28M, resulting in a net margin of 23.6%.

MNST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a net income of 442.99M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in a net margin of 23.9%.