PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CL vs. 2B7K.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CL vs. 2B7K.DE

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company) is a stock, while 2B7K.DE (iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI World SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels. Over the past 5 years, CL returned 4.48%/yr vs 9.82%/yr for 2B7K.DE. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CL vs. 2B7K.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (2B7K.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CL is traded in USD, while 2B7K.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 2B7K.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CL achieves a 16.05% return, which is significantly higher than 2B7K.DE's 11.21% return.

CL

1D
1.26%
1M
2.78%
YTD
16.05%
6M
15.45%
1Y
2.89%
3Y*
7.73%
5Y*
4.48%
10Y*
4.84%

2B7K.DE

1D
1.33%
1M
4.59%
YTD
11.21%
6M
12.17%
1Y
22.66%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
9.82%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CL vs. 2B7K.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company		16.05%-10.98%16.57%3.78%-5.44%2.08%27.17%5.45%
2B7K.DE
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)		11.21%16.13%10.82%24.66%-21.49%25.95%20.24%18.23%

Correlation

The correlation between CL and 2B7K.DE is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2019

0.14

The correlation between CL and 2B7K.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (3 years) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Colgate-Palmolive Company

iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)

Often compared with CL:
CL vs. PGCL vs. KMBCL vs. GSCL vs. CATCL vs. CPRXCL vs. CVXCL vs. SCHD
Often compared with 2B7K.DE:
2B7K.DE vs. ACWI2B7K.DE vs. IWRD.AS2B7K.DE vs. IESE.AS2B7K.DE vs. H410.DE2B7K.DE vs. SXR8.DE2B7K.DE vs. SPYG2B7K.DE vs. XDWT.DE

Return for Risk

CL vs. 2B7K.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CL
CL Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
CL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
CL Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
CL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
CL Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
2B7K.DE
2B7K.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
2B7K.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B7K.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B7K.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
2B7K.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B7K.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CL vs. 2B7K.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (2B7K.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

CL2B7K.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.13
1.68

-1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.36
2.49

-2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.29

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

2.36

-2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.26

9.11

-8.85

CL vs. 2B7K.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CL Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the 2B7K.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CL and 2B7K.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CL vs. 2B7K.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CL drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than 2B7K.DE's maximum drawdown of -32.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL and 2B7K.DE.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CL2B7K.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.91%

-32.12%

-26.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.64%

-9.56%

-9.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.05%

-18.46%

-10.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.05%

-29.24%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.05%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.22%

0.00%

-13.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.24%

-5.93%

-5.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.33%

2.48%

+8.85%

Volatility

CL vs. 2B7K.DE - Volatility Comparison

Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) has a higher volatility of 8.34% compared to iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (2B7K.DE) at 4.21%. This indicates that CL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2B7K.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CL2B7K.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.34%

4.21%

+4.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.30%

10.61%

+6.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.65%

13.48%

+8.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.82%

16.18%

+2.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.76%

17.38%

+2.38%

Dividends

CL vs. 2B7K.DE - Dividend Comparison

CL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, while 2B7K.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
2B7K.DE
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company		2.31%2.61%2.18%2.40%2.36%2.10%2.05%2.48%2.79%2.11%2.37%2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

CL and 2B7K.DE have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CL and 2B7K.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer