PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2B7K.DE vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

2B7K.DE vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (2B7K.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

2B7K.DE is traded in EUR, while ACWI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ACWI values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2B7K.DE achieves a 12.95% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 13.73% return.


2B7K.DE

1D
-0.29%
1M
3.61%
YTD
12.95%
6M
13.14%
1Y
22.60%
3Y*
13.84%
5Y*
10.25%
10Y*

ACWI

1D
0.00%
1M
1.06%
YTD
13.73%
6M
12.85%
1Y
26.83%
3Y*
18.27%
5Y*
11.77%
10Y*
12.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2B7K.DE vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
2B7K.DE
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
12.95%2.87%17.54%20.84%-16.92%36.73%9.54%20.04%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
13.24%7.89%25.20%18.61%-13.33%27.54%6.75%15.51%

Correlation

The correlation between 2B7K.DE and ACWI is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2019

0.60

The correlation between 2B7K.DE and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2B7K.DE vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2B7K.DE
2B7K.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
2B7K.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B7K.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B7K.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
2B7K.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B7K.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2B7K.DE vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (2B7K.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


2B7K.DEACWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.40

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

3.79

-0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.97

15.54

-4.57

2B7K.DE vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2B7K.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2B7K.DE and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

2B7K.DE vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2B7K.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.63%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B7K.DE and ACWI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2B7K.DEACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.63%

-45.79%

+14.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.66%

-7.11%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.33%

-20.51%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.33%

-20.51%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-1.32%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.10%

-6.41%

+1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

1.73%

+0.32%

Volatility

2B7K.DE vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (2B7K.DE) is 3.41%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a volatility of 4.60%. This indicates that 2B7K.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2B7K.DEACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

4.60%

-1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.54%

10.06%

-0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.66%

12.80%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.66%

15.22%

-0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.17%

16.97%

-0.80%

2B7K.DE vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

2B7K.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

2B7K.DE vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

2B7K.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
2B7K.DE
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.46%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


2B7K.DE and ACWI have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 2B7K.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

2B7K.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.

2B7K.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ACWI is Global Equities. 2B7K.DE tracks MSCI World SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for 2B7K.DE and 0.32% for ACWI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2B7K.DE and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer