PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIM vs. REFI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CIM vs. REFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) and Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIM achieves a 10.78% return, which is significantly higher than REFI's -2.68% return.


CIM

1D
0.08%
1M
0.23%
YTD
10.78%
6M
9.84%
1Y
9.45%
3Y*
3.87%
5Y*
-11.82%
10Y*
-1.39%

REFI

1D
3.06%
1M
0.53%
YTD
-2.68%
6M
-4.63%
1Y
-6.81%
3Y*
3.02%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIM vs. REFI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CIM
Chimera Investment Corporation
10.78%-0.65%3.61%2.95%-57.95%-6.01%
REFI
Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
-2.68%-8.70%8.69%23.70%3.35%1.52%

Correlation

The correlation between CIM and REFI is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021

0.39

The correlation between CIM and REFI shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CIM:

$1.11B

REFI:

$245.99M

EPS

CIM:

$0.23

REFI:

$226.63

PE Ratio

CIM:

56.88

REFI:

0.05

PEG Ratio

CIM:

0.12

REFI:

0.00

PS Ratio

CIM:

2.20

REFI:

5.54

PB Ratio

CIM:

0.45

REFI:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

CIM:

$499.18M

REFI:

$44.35M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CIM:

$465.68M

REFI:

$42.41M

EBITDA (TTM)

CIM:

$439.34M

REFI:

$8.16M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIM vs. REFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIM
CIM Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
CIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIM Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
CIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIM Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

REFI
REFI Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
REFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
REFI Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
REFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
REFI Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIM vs. REFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) and Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIMREFIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

0.97

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

-0.46

+0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.27

-0.82

+2.09

CIM vs. REFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIM Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is higher than the REFI Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIM and REFI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CIM vs. REFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIM drawdown since its inception was -89.69%, which is greater than REFI's maximum drawdown of -26.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIM and REFI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIMREFIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.69%

-26.55%

-63.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.18%

-14.71%

-3.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.80%

-19.25%

-16.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.51%

-15.63%

-43.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.75%

-9.93%

-41.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.48%

8.28%

-0.80%

Volatility

CIM vs. REFI - Volatility Comparison

Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) and Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI) have volatilities of 5.94% and 6.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIMREFIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.94%

6.25%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.77%

16.18%

+1.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.07%

23.78%

+1.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.22%

24.32%

+10.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.49%

24.32%

+12.17%

Dividends

CIM vs. REFI - Dividend Comparison

CIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.75%, less than REFI's 16.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIM
Chimera Investment Corporation
11.75%11.91%10.14%14.03%20.36%8.55%13.66%9.73%11.22%8.12%14.34%28.15%
REFI
Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
16.42%15.33%13.36%13.41%13.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CIM vs. REFI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chimera Investment Corporation and Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-200.00M-100.00M0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M2022202320242025202600
(CIM) Total Revenue
(REFI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CIM and REFI have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REFI has higher volatility (6.25%) compared to CIM (5.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIM dropped -89.69% vs REFI's -26.55%.

CIM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIM and REFI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer