CIFU vs. WTIU
CIFU (T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF) and WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds from REX. CIFU is actively managed, while WTIU is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. CIFU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for WTIU.
Performance
CIFU vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIFU achieves a -26.03% return, which is significantly lower than WTIU's 73.82% return.
CIFU
- 1D
- -20.66%
- 1M
- -58.62%
- 6M
- -45.17%
- YTD
- -26.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WTIU
- 1D
- 3.33%
- 1M
- 13.68%
- 6M
- 53.88%
- YTD
- 73.82%
- 1Y
- 70.82%
- 3Y*
- 2.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIFU vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF | -26.03% | -13.41% |
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 73.82% | -3.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIFU and WTIU is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025 | -0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIFU vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank
CIFU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WTIU
CIFU vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CIFU | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.20 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.48 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.46 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIFU vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIFU drawdown since its inception was -77.20%, roughly equal to the maximum WTIU drawdown of -75.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFU and WTIU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIFU | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.20% | -75.73% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -48.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -75.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.94% | -38.39% | -27.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.91% | -39.32% | -3.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 20.53% | — |
Volatility
CIFU vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIFU | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 20.68% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 57.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 206.70% | 69.27% | +137.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 206.70% | 70.88% | +135.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 206.70% | 70.88% | +135.82% |
CIFU vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIFU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than WTIU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIFU vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison
Neither CIFU nor WTIU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CIFU and WTIU have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WTIU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WTIU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CIFU.
CIFU and WTIU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CIFU and 0.95% for WTIU.
Find the right allocation for CIFU and WTIU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer