CIFU vs. COTG
CIFU (T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF) and COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CIFU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COTG.
Performance
CIFU vs. COTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIFU achieves a 90.91% return, which is significantly higher than COTG's 17.32% return.
CIFU
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 94.18%
- YTD
- 90.91%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COTG
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -11.21%
- YTD
- 17.32%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIFU vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF | 90.91% | -6.67% |
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 17.32% | -9.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIFU and COTG is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIFU vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIFU | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | -0.28 | +1.27 |
Drawdowns
CIFU vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIFU drawdown since its inception was -77.20%, which is greater than COTG's maximum drawdown of -25.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFU and COTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIFU | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.20% | -25.69% | -51.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.09% | -23.48% | +14.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.35% | -8.35% | -37.00% |
Volatility
CIFU vs. COTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIFU | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 206.19% | 40.65% | +165.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 206.19% | 40.65% | +165.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 206.19% | 40.65% | +165.54% |
CIFU vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIFU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIFU vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison
Neither CIFU nor COTG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CIFU and COTG have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CIFU.
CIFU and COTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CIFU and 0.75% for COTG.
Find the right allocation for CIFU and COTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer