CIFU vs. COTG
CIFU (T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF) and COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. CIFU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COTG.
Performance
CIFU vs. COTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIFU achieves a 94.41% return, which is significantly higher than COTG's 15.84% return.
CIFU
- 1D
- -4.06%
- 1M
- 42.63%
- YTD
- 94.41%
- 6M
- 64.26%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COTG
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- -14.19%
- YTD
- 15.84%
- 6M
- 17.42%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIFU vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF | 94.41% | -13.41% |
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 15.84% | -8.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIFU and COTG is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIFU vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIFU vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIFU drawdown since its inception was -77.20%, which is greater than COTG's maximum drawdown of -25.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFU and COTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIFU | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.20% | -25.69% | -51.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.48% | -24.45% | +13.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.93% | -9.72% | -33.21% |
Volatility
CIFU vs. COTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIFU | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 207.07% | 40.02% | +167.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 207.07% | 40.02% | +167.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 207.07% | 40.02% | +167.05% |
CIFU vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIFU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIFU vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison
Neither CIFU nor COTG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CIFU and COTG have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CIFU.
CIFU and COTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CIFU and 0.75% for COTG.
Find the right allocation for CIFU and COTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer