PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLSG vs. ARMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLSG vs. ARMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLSG achieves a -58.79% return, which is significantly lower than ARMG's 936.32% return.


BLSG

1D
-15.77%
1M
-55.27%
YTD
-58.79%
6M
-73.27%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARMG

1D
4.85%
1M
261.28%
YTD
936.32%
6M
526.62%
1Y
510.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLSG vs. ARMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BLSG
Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF
-58.79%-60.00%
ARMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF
936.32%-64.25%

Correlation

The correlation between BLSG and ARMG is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLSG vs. ARMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLSG

ARMG
ARMG Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ARMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
ARMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARMG Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLSG vs. ARMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLSG vs. ARMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLSGARMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.66

1.24

-1.90

Drawdowns

BLSG vs. ARMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLSG drawdown since its inception was -83.67%, roughly equal to the maximum ARMG drawdown of -80.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLSG and ARMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLSGARMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.67%

-80.28%

-3.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-68.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-83.52%

0.00%

-83.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.12%

-53.04%

-7.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.55%

Volatility

BLSG vs. ARMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLSGARMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

64.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

103.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

145.44%

130.31%

+15.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

145.44%

138.30%

+7.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

145.44%

138.30%

+7.14%

BLSG vs. ARMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BLSG and ARMG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

BLSG vs. ARMG - Dividend Comparison

BLSG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BLSG and ARMG have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BLSG and ARMG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

ARMG has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.00% for BLSG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLSG and ARMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer