BLSG vs. XDQQ
BLSG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF) and XDQQ (Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BLSG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDQQ.
Performance
BLSG vs. XDQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLSG achieves a -78.12% return, which is significantly lower than XDQQ's -3.31% return.
BLSG
- 1D
- -5.50%
- 1M
- -30.51%
- 6M
- -63.75%
- YTD
- -78.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
XDQQ
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -3.35%
- 6M
- -4.49%
- YTD
- -3.31%
- 1Y
- 8.25%
- 3Y*
- 13.96%
- 5Y*
- 6.00%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.60%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $301.29K | $222.55K | $310.26K | |
| $486.75K | $670.10K | $337.67K |
BLSG vs. XDQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BLSG Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF | -78.12% | -58.81% |
XDQQ Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly | -3.31% | 2.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLSG and XDQQ is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLSG vs. XDQQ — Risk / Return Rank
BLSG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XDQQ
BLSG vs. XDQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSG) and Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLSG | XDQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.09 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.56 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.24 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLSG vs. XDQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLSG drawdown since its inception was -91.34%, which is greater than XDQQ's maximum drawdown of -35.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLSG and XDQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLSG | XDQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.34% | -35.63% | -55.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.25% | -6.13% | -85.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.68% | -10.57% | -55.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.95% | — |
Volatility
BLSG vs. XDQQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLSG | XDQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 146.30% | 15.47% | +130.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 146.30% | 20.02% | +126.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 146.30% | 19.61% | +126.69% |
BLSG vs. XDQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLSG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than XDQQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLSG vs. XDQQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither BLSG nor XDQQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BLSG and XDQQ have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BLSG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BLSG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XDQQ.
BLSG and XDQQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BLSG and 0.79% for XDQQ.
Find the right allocation for BLSG and XDQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer