CIFG vs. NBIG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CIFG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF) and NBIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

CIFG vs. NBIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIFG achieves a 92.34% return, which is significantly lower than NBIG's 453.13% return.

CIFG

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 94.51%
• YTD: 92.34%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NBIG

• 1D: -6.73%
• 1M: 83.04%
• YTD: 453.13%
• 6M: 273.38%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIFG vs. NBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF	92.34%	-42.39%
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF	453.13%	-25.03%

Correlation

The correlation between CIFG and NBIG is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025	0.63

Return for Risk

CIFG vs. NBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CIFG	NBIG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	1.21	-1.09

Drawdowns

CIFG vs. NBIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIFG drawdown since its inception was -71.71%, smaller than the maximum NBIG drawdown of -75.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFG and NBIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIFG	NBIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.71%	-75.83%	+4.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.35%	-9.57%	+9.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.01%	-43.08%	+5.07%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CIFG	NBIG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	203.83%	201.21%	+2.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	203.83%	201.21%	+2.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	203.83%	201.21%	+2.62%

CIFG vs. NBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CIFG and NBIG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

CIFG vs. NBIG - Dividend Comparison

Neither CIFG nor NBIG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CIFG and NBIG in my portfolio?

CIFG and NBIG have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CIFG or NBIG?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CIFG or NBIG?

CIFG and NBIG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CIFG or NBIG?

CIFG and NBIG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.