PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIFG vs. GMEU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIFG vs. GMEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG) and T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF (GMEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIFG achieves a 92.34% return, which is significantly higher than GMEU's -0.46% return.


CIFG

1D
-0.35%
1M
94.51%
YTD
92.34%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GMEU

1D
12.74%
1M
-16.79%
YTD
-0.46%
6M
-28.05%
1Y
-69.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIFG vs. GMEU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CIFG
Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF
92.34%-42.39%
GMEU
T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF
-0.46%-17.36%

Correlation

The correlation between CIFG and GMEU is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIFG vs. GMEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIFG

GMEU
GMEU Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
GMEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMEU Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
GMEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMEU Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIFG vs. GMEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG) and T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF (GMEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CIFG vs. GMEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CIFGGMEUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

-0.70

+0.82

Drawdowns

CIFG vs. GMEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIFG drawdown since its inception was -71.71%, smaller than the maximum GMEU drawdown of -80.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFG and GMEU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIFGGMEUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.71%

-80.43%

+8.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-77.94%

+77.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.01%

-63.19%

+25.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

57.02%

Volatility

CIFG vs. GMEU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIFGGMEUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

203.83%

85.19%

+118.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

203.83%

89.95%

+113.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

203.83%

89.95%

+113.88%

CIFG vs. GMEU - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIFG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GMEU's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

CIFG vs. GMEU - Dividend Comparison

Neither CIFG nor GMEU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CIFG and GMEU have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CIFG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CIFG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for GMEU.

CIFG and GMEU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CIFG and 1.50% for GMEU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIFG and GMEU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer