GMEU vs. TSLZ

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

GMEU (T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF) and TSLZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GMEU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while TSLZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GMEU returned -38.64% vs -48.25% for TSLZ. Their -0.29 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. GMEU charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSLZ.

Performance

GMEU vs. TSLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF (GMEU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMEU achieves a -10.68% return, which is significantly lower than TSLZ's 45.39% return.

GMEU

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: -11.89%
• 6M: -34.35%
• YTD: -10.68%
• 1Y: -38.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -61.04%

TSLZ

• 1D: -1.43%
• 1M: 44.35%
• 6M: 37.89%
• YTD: 45.39%
• 1Y: -48.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -71.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GMEU T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF	$3.41M	$2.21M	$2.51M
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF	$39.89M	$35.72M	$42.79M

GMEU vs. TSLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GMEU T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF	-10.68%	-65.67%
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF	45.39%	-75.59%

Correlation

The correlation between GMEU and TSLZ is -0.27, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025	-0.29

Return for Risk

GMEU vs. TSLZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GMEU

GMEU Risk / Return Rank: 5
GMEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
GMEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
GMEU Omega Ratio Rank: 5
GMEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
GMEU Martin Ratio Rank: 4

TSLZ

TSLZ Risk / Return Rank: 5
TSLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
TSLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
TSLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6
TSLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
TSLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GMEU vs. TSLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF (GMEU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GMEU	TSLZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.58	-0.51	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.57	-0.33	-0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	0.96	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.69	-0.67	-0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.01	-0.82	-0.19

GMEU vs. TSLZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMEU Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is comparable to the TSLZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMEU and TSLZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GMEU vs. TSLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMEU drawdown since its inception was -81.07%, smaller than the maximum TSLZ drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMEU and TSLZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMEU	TSLZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.07%	-99.11%	+18.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.59%	-69.73%	+10.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-80.20%	-98.47%	+18.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-65.03%	-76.60%	+11.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.57%	56.63%	-16.06%

Volatility

GMEU vs. TSLZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF (GMEU) is 13.01%, while T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) has a volatility of 37.13%. This indicates that GMEU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GMEU	TSLZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.01%	37.13%	-24.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.03%	67.39%	-14.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.63%	91.79%	-21.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	85.59%	117.68%	-32.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	85.59%	117.68%	-32.09%

GMEU vs. TSLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMEU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

GMEU vs. TSLZ - Dividend Comparison

GMEU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GMEU T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF	0.47%	0.69%	2.08%	12.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GMEU and TSLZ in my portfolio?

GMEU and TSLZ have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GMEU or TSLZ?

TSLZ has higher volatility (37.13%) compared to GMEU (13.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMEU dropped -81.07% vs TSLZ's -99.11%.

Which ETF is better, GMEU or TSLZ?

On 1-year performance, GMEU leads with -38.64% vs -48.25% for TSLZ. On fees, TSLZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, GMEU has been the lower-risk option at 13.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GMEU or TSLZ?

Over the 1-year period, GMEU has performed better with a -38.64% return vs -48.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GMEU or TSLZ?

TSLZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for GMEU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GMEU or TSLZ?

TSLZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.00% for GMEU.

What is the main difference between GMEU and TSLZ?

GMEU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSLZ is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for GMEU and 1.05% for TSLZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TSLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.51 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.