CIFG vs. CLSX
CIFG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF) and CLSX (Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CIFG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for CLSX.
Performance
CIFG vs. CLSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIFG achieves a 96.56% return, which is significantly higher than CLSX's 80.44% return.
CIFG
- 1D
- -3.87%
- 1M
- 42.24%
- YTD
- 96.56%
- 6M
- 67.07%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLSX
- 1D
- -3.15%
- 1M
- 9.80%
- YTD
- 80.44%
- 6M
- 38.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIFG vs. CLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF | 96.56% | -32.52% |
CLSX Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF | 80.44% | -54.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIFG and CLSX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIFG vs. CLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG) and Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF (CLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIFG vs. CLSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIFG drawdown since its inception was -71.71%, smaller than the maximum CLSX drawdown of -93.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFG and CLSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIFG | CLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.71% | -93.16% | +21.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.44% | -74.43% | +63.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.54% | -69.43% | +33.89% |
Volatility
CIFG vs. CLSX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIFG | CLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 205.93% | 190.48% | +15.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 205.93% | 190.48% | +15.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 205.93% | 190.48% | +15.45% |
CIFG vs. CLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIFG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CLSX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIFG vs. CLSX - Dividend Comparison
Neither CIFG nor CLSX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CIFG and CLSX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CIFG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIFG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CLSX.
CIFG and CLSX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Tradr ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CIFG and 1.30% for CLSX.
Find the right allocation for CIFG and CLSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer