PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CICHY vs. IDCBY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CICHY vs. IDCBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in China Construction Bank Corp (CICHY) and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CICHY achieves a 12.01% return, which is significantly lower than IDCBY's 13.77% return. Over the past 10 years, CICHY has outperformed IDCBY with an annualized return of 13.56%, while IDCBY has yielded a comparatively lower 12.80% annualized return.


CICHY

1D
0.91%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
12.01%
6M
13.04%
1Y
14.00%
3Y*
31.33%
5Y*
15.57%
10Y*
13.56%

IDCBY

1D
1.31%
1M
2.35%
YTD
13.77%
6M
15.89%
1Y
21.05%
3Y*
30.84%
5Y*
15.83%
10Y*
12.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CICHY vs. IDCBY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CICHY
China Construction Bank Corp
12.01%31.78%49.67%4.46%-2.29%-3.15%-8.81%11.09%-7.66%33.81%
IDCBY
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited
13.77%32.13%47.21%3.91%-2.05%-6.39%-12.54%13.02%-8.08%42.02%

Correlation

The correlation between CICHY and IDCBY is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2009

0.80

The correlation between CICHY and IDCBY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CICHY:

$288.94B

IDCBY:

$317.74B

EPS

CICHY:

CN¥24.86

IDCBY:

CN¥20.11

PE Ratio

CICHY:

6.01

IDCBY:

6.00

PEG Ratio

CICHY:

0.57

IDCBY:

7.50

PS Ratio

CICHY:

1.80

IDCBY:

1.70

PB Ratio

CICHY:

0.53

IDCBY:

0.55

Total Revenue (TTM)

CICHY:

CN¥1.14T

IDCBY:

CN¥1.28T

Gross Profit (TTM)

CICHY:

CN¥760.54B

IDCBY:

CN¥499.90B

EBITDA (TTM)

CICHY:

CN¥402.61B

IDCBY:

CN¥428.13B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CICHY vs. IDCBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CICHY
CICHY Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
CICHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CICHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
CICHY Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
CICHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
CICHY Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

IDCBY
IDCBY Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IDCBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDCBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDCBY Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IDCBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDCBY Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CICHY vs. IDCBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Construction Bank Corp (CICHY) and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CICHYIDCBYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.20

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

1.88

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.38

5.37

-2.99

CICHY vs. IDCBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CICHY Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the IDCBY Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CICHY and IDCBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CICHY vs. IDCBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CICHY drawdown since its inception was -44.82%, smaller than the maximum IDCBY drawdown of -78.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CICHY and IDCBY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CICHYIDCBYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.82%

-78.73%

+33.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.49%

-11.23%

-4.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.49%

-15.59%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

-25.73%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.27%

-39.70%

-0.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.66%

-3.26%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.30%

-48.86%

+30.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.89%

3.93%

+1.96%

Volatility

CICHY vs. IDCBY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for China Construction Bank Corp (CICHY) is 6.01%, while Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) has a volatility of 6.56%. This indicates that CICHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDCBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CICHYIDCBYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.01%

6.56%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.79%

13.11%

+0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.85%

18.49%

+1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.24%

21.31%

-0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.81%

22.80%

+0.01%

Dividends

CICHY vs. IDCBY - Dividend Comparison

CICHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than IDCBY's 7.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CICHY
China Construction Bank Corp
2.37%8.26%6.71%9.13%8.70%6.32%5.08%4.42%4.80%8.33%10.74%6.14%
IDCBY
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited
7.58%7.76%6.36%8.69%8.61%7.32%4.84%3.91%4.48%3.49%12.32%7.11%

Financials

CICHY vs. IDCBY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Construction Bank Corp and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


150.00B200.00B250.00B300.00B350.00B400.00B20222023202420252026
345.49B
386.17B
(CICHY) Total Revenue
(IDCBY) Total Revenue
Values in CNY except per share items

CICHY vs. IDCBY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between China Construction Bank Corp and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
61.1%
40.3%
Portfolio components
CICHY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Construction Bank Corp reported a gross profit of 211.00B and revenue of 345.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.1%.

IDCBY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported a gross profit of 155.43B and revenue of 386.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.3%.

CICHY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Construction Bank Corp reported an operating income of 99.20B and revenue of 345.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.7%.

IDCBY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported an operating income of 101.34B and revenue of 386.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.2%.

CICHY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Construction Bank Corp reported a net income of 86.29B and revenue of 345.49B, resulting in a net margin of 25.0%.

IDCBY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported a net income of 86.42B and revenue of 386.17B, resulting in a net margin of 22.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CICHY and IDCBY have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDCBY has higher volatility (6.56%) compared to CICHY (6.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CICHY dropped -44.82% vs IDCBY's -78.73%.

IDCBY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CICHY and IDCBY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer