CICHF vs. BYDDY
CICHF (China Construction Bank Corporation) and BYDDY (BYD Company Limited ADR) are both stocks. CICHF operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services), while BYDDY operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, CICHF returned 15.61%/yr vs 18.43%/yr for BYDDY. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CICHF vs. BYDDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CICHF achieves a 11.79% return, which is significantly higher than BYDDY's -20.18% return. Over the past 10 years, CICHF has underperformed BYDDY with an annualized return of 15.61%, while BYDDY has yielded a comparatively higher 18.43% annualized return.
CICHF
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- -6.78%
- YTD
- 11.79%
- 6M
- 14.58%
- 1Y
- 13.66%
- 3Y*
- 29.53%
- 5Y*
- 14.01%
- 10Y*
- 15.61%
BYDDY
- 1D
- -3.12%
- 1M
- -16.67%
- YTD
- -20.18%
- 6M
- -18.84%
- 1Y
- -40.10%
- 3Y*
- -2.80%
- 5Y*
- 0.41%
- 10Y*
- 18.43%
CICHF vs. BYDDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CICHF China Construction Bank Corporation | 11.79% | 22.19% | 58.20% | -0.14% | -8.94% | 4.95% | -12.31% | 11.35% | -10.33% | 105.09% |
BYDDY BYD Company Limited ADR | -20.18% | 7.97% | 24.81% | 13.06% | -27.17% | 28.02% | 432.95% | -21.04% | -27.71% | 69.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between CICHF and BYDDY is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2008 | 0.12 |
Fundamentals
CICHF:
$36.70B
BYDDY:
$87.71B
CICHF:
CN¥3.88
BYDDY:
CN¥3.03
CICHF:
1.92
BYDDY:
21.49
CICHF:
0.67
BYDDY:
0.16
CICHF:
0.57
BYDDY:
0.75
CICHF:
0.07
BYDDY:
2.37
CICHF:
CN¥1.14T
BYDDY:
CN¥779.53B
CICHF:
CN¥701.45B
BYDDY:
CN¥132.63B
CICHF:
CN¥397.42B
BYDDY:
CN¥33.66B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CICHF vs. BYDDY — Risk / Return Rank
CICHF
BYDDY
CICHF vs. BYDDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Construction Bank Corporation (CICHF) and BYD Company Limited ADR (BYDDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CICHF | BYDDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 0.82 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | -0.93 | +1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.33 | -1.71 | +3.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CICHF vs. BYDDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CICHF drawdown since its inception was -72.65%, smaller than the maximum BYDDY drawdown of -97.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CICHF and BYDDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CICHF | BYDDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.65% | -97.38% | +24.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.11% | -43.07% | +23.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.11% | -50.50% | +31.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.97% | -50.50% | +18.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.43% | -58.18% | +12.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.33% | -50.50% | +42.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.81% | -63.71% | +40.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.27% | 23.49% | -13.22% |
Volatility
CICHF vs. BYDDY - Volatility Comparison
China Construction Bank Corporation (CICHF) has a higher volatility of 18.81% compared to BYD Company Limited ADR (BYDDY) at 8.93%. This indicates that CICHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BYDDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CICHF | BYDDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.81% | 8.93% | +9.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.15% | 28.94% | +25.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.08% | 37.07% | +34.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.20% | 45.59% | +3.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.44% | 47.26% | +4.18% |
Dividends
CICHF vs. BYDDY - Dividend Comparison
CICHF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BYDDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYDDY BYD Company Limited ADR | 0.55% | 1.45% | 1.26% | 0.60% | 0.07% | 0.07% | 0.03% | 0.47% | 0.28% | 0.52% | 1.92% | 0.00% |
CICHF China Construction Bank Corporation | 0.00% | 5.69% | 6.51% | 9.14% | 0.00% | 7.05% | 6.25% | 5.17% | 0.00% | 34.73% | 43.08% | 55.64% |
Financials
CICHF vs. BYDDY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Construction Bank Corporation and BYD Company Limited ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CICHF vs. BYDDY - Profitability Comparison
CICHF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Construction Bank Corporation reported a gross profit of 151.30B and revenue of 345.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.8%.
BYDDY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BYD Company Limited ADR reported a gross profit of 28.25B and revenue of 150.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.8%.
CICHF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Construction Bank Corporation reported an operating income of 98.25B and revenue of 345.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.
BYDDY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BYD Company Limited ADR reported an operating income of 7.18B and revenue of 150.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.8%.
CICHF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Construction Bank Corporation reported a net income of 85.47B and revenue of 345.57B, resulting in a net margin of 24.7%.
BYDDY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BYD Company Limited ADR reported a net income of 4.08B and revenue of 150.23B, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CICHF and BYDDY have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CICHF has higher volatility (18.81%) compared to BYDDY (8.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CICHF dropped -72.65% vs BYDDY's -97.38%.
CICHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.19 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CICHF and BYDDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer