CICHF vs. MSFT
Compare and contrast key facts about China Construction Bank Corporation (CICHF) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT).
Performance
CICHF vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CICHF vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CICHF China Construction Bank Corporation | 3.16% | 22.19% | 58.20% | -0.14% | -8.94% | 4.95% | -12.31% | 11.35% | -10.33% | 105.09% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -23.28% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -28.02% | 52.48% | 42.53% | 57.56% | 20.80% | 40.73% |
Fundamentals
CICHF:
$32.60B
MSFT:
$2.76T
CICHF:
$3.20
MSFT:
$15.98
CICHF:
0.32
MSFT:
23.16
CICHF:
0.11
MSFT:
1.62
CICHF:
0.11
MSFT:
9.04
CICHF:
0.01
MSFT:
7.06
CICHF:
$987.38B
MSFT:
$305.45B
CICHF:
$740.21B
MSFT:
$209.50B
CICHF:
$292.62B
MSFT:
$191.39B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CICHF achieves a 3.16% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -23.28% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CICHF having a 22.32% annualized return and MSFT not far ahead at 22.44%.
CICHF
- 1D
- 4.00%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- 3.16%
- 6M
- 5.61%
- 1Y
- 19.99%
- 3Y*
- 26.33%
- 5Y*
- 10.02%
- 10Y*
- 22.32%
MSFT
- 1D
- 3.12%
- 1M
- -5.75%
- YTD
- -23.28%
- 6M
- -28.23%
- 1Y
- -0.64%
- 3Y*
- 9.54%
- 5Y*
- 9.74%
- 10Y*
- 22.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CICHF vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank
CICHF
MSFT
CICHF vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Construction Bank Corporation (CICHF) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CICHF | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.34 | -0.02 | +0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.91 | 0.15 | +0.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.02 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | -0.05 | +1.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.07 | -0.12 | +2.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CICHF | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 | -0.02 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.37 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.84 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.74 | -0.55 |
Correlation
The correlation between CICHF and MSFT is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CICHF vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
CICHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, more than MSFT's 0.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CICHF China Construction Bank Corporation | 2.86% | 5.69% | 6.51% | 9.14% | 0.00% | 7.05% | 6.25% | 5.17% | 0.00% | 34.73% | 43.08% | 55.64% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.94% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
Drawdowns
CICHF vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CICHF drawdown since its inception was -91.11%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CICHF and MSFT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CICHF | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.11% | -69.38% | -21.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.11% | -33.91% | +14.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.46% | -37.15% | +3.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.43% | -37.15% | -8.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.56% | -31.43% | +22.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.70% | -21.77% | -19.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.68% | 12.46% | -2.78% |
Volatility
CICHF vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
China Construction Bank Corporation (CICHF) has a higher volatility of 16.70% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 6.48%. This indicates that CICHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CICHF | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.70% | 6.48% | +10.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.76% | 19.15% | +22.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.33% | 26.46% | +31.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.66% | 26.19% | +19.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.85% | 26.89% | +28.96% |
Financials
CICHF vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Construction Bank Corporation and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CICHF vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison
CICHF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, China Construction Bank Corporation reported a gross profit of 177.04B and revenue of 327.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.1%.
MSFT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 55.30B and revenue of 81.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.0%.
CICHF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, China Construction Bank Corporation reported an operating income of 89.71B and revenue of 327.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.4%.
MSFT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.28B and revenue of 81.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 47.1%.
CICHF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, China Construction Bank Corporation reported a net income of 80.35B and revenue of 327.38B, resulting in a net margin of 24.5%.
MSFT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 38.46B and revenue of 81.27B, resulting in a net margin of 47.3%.