PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CICHF vs. MSFT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CICHF and MSFT is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.1

Performance

CICHF vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in China Construction Bank Corporation (CICHF) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

2,000.00%2,200.00%2,400.00%2,600.00%2,800.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
2,691.52%
2,254.79%
CICHF
MSFT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CICHF:

0.73

MSFT:

0.94

Sortino Ratio

CICHF:

1.37

MSFT:

1.30

Omega Ratio

CICHF:

1.19

MSFT:

1.18

Calmar Ratio

CICHF:

1.73

MSFT:

1.21

Martin Ratio

CICHF:

5.61

MSFT:

2.77

Ulcer Index

CICHF:

8.35%

MSFT:

6.75%

Daily Std Dev

CICHF:

66.34%

MSFT:

19.81%

Max Drawdown

CICHF:

-90.94%

MSFT:

-69.39%

Current Drawdown

CICHF:

-3.66%

MSFT:

-6.27%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CICHF:

$204.12B

MSFT:

$3.38T

EPS

CICHF:

$0.18

MSFT:

$12.10

PE Ratio

CICHF:

4.22

MSFT:

37.56

PEG Ratio

CICHF:

1.37

MSFT:

2.41

Total Revenue (TTM)

CICHF:

$1.08T

MSFT:

$254.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CICHF:

$1.08T

MSFT:

$176.28B

EBITDA (TTM)

CICHF:

$402.78B

MSFT:

$139.14B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CICHF achieves a 45.35% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's 16.97% return. Over the past 10 years, CICHF has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 19.26%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 26.56% annualized return.


CICHF

YTD

45.35%

1M

8.22%

6M

22.61%

1Y

56.03%

5Y*

11.20%

10Y*

19.26%

MSFT

YTD

16.97%

1M

5.29%

6M

-2.56%

1Y

17.76%

5Y*

23.77%

10Y*

26.56%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CICHF vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Construction Bank Corporation (CICHF) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CICHF, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.020.94
The chart of Sortino ratio for CICHF, currently valued at 1.68, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.681.30
The chart of Omega ratio for CICHF, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.291.18
The chart of Calmar ratio for CICHF, currently valued at 2.56, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.561.21
The chart of Martin ratio for CICHF, currently valued at 9.82, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.009.822.77
CICHF
MSFT

The current CICHF Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is comparable to the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CICHF and MSFT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.02
0.94
CICHF
MSFT

Dividends

CICHF vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

CICHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.09%, more than MSFT's 0.71% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CICHF
China Construction Bank Corporation
7.09%9.13%8.41%7.09%6.25%5.16%47.17%4.46%5.60%7.00%5.96%35.92%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.71%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%2.48%2.59%

Drawdowns

CICHF vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CICHF drawdown since its inception was -90.94%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CICHF and MSFT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-3.66%
-6.27%
CICHF
MSFT

Volatility

CICHF vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

China Construction Bank Corporation (CICHF) has a higher volatility of 25.75% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 5.74%. This indicates that CICHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
25.75%
5.74%
CICHF
MSFT

Financials

CICHF vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Construction Bank Corporation and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab