PortfoliosLab logo
CICHF vs. MSFT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CICHF and MSFT is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CICHF vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in China Construction Bank Corporation (CICHF) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CICHF:

0.87

MSFT:

0.34

Sortino Ratio

CICHF:

1.67

MSFT:

0.72

Omega Ratio

CICHF:

1.20

MSFT:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

CICHF:

2.68

MSFT:

0.41

Martin Ratio

CICHF:

8.64

MSFT:

0.90

Ulcer Index

CICHF:

8.40%

MSFT:

10.69%

Daily Std Dev

CICHF:

74.22%

MSFT:

25.69%

Max Drawdown

CICHF:

-90.82%

MSFT:

-69.39%

Current Drawdown

CICHF:

-2.22%

MSFT:

-1.26%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CICHF:

$224.21B

MSFT:

$3.41T

EPS

CICHF:

$0.18

MSFT:

$12.94

PE Ratio

CICHF:

4.89

MSFT:

35.46

PEG Ratio

CICHF:

1.91

MSFT:

2.13

PS Ratio

CICHF:

0.37

MSFT:

12.63

PB Ratio

CICHF:

0.47

MSFT:

10.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

CICHF:

$904.33B

MSFT:

$270.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CICHF:

$904.33B

MSFT:

$186.51B

EBITDA (TTM)

CICHF:

$5.32B

MSFT:

$150.06B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CICHF achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's 9.12% return. Over the past 10 years, CICHF has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 12.03%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 27.40% annualized return.


CICHF

YTD

9.70%

1M

6.22%

6M

29.13%

1Y

36.67%

3Y*

20.50%

5Y*

11.38%

10Y*

12.03%

MSFT

YTD

9.12%

1M

24.81%

6M

10.31%

1Y

8.54%

3Y*

22.98%

5Y*

21.12%

10Y*

27.40%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Microsoft Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CICHF vs. MSFT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CICHF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CICHF is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CICHF is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CICHF is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CICHF is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CICHF is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CICHF is 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MSFT is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MSFT is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MSFT is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MSFT is 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MSFT is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MSFT is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CICHF vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Construction Bank Corporation (CICHF) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CICHF Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CICHF and MSFT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CICHF vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

CICHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.73%, more than MSFT's 0.71% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CICHF
China Construction Bank Corporation
12.73%6.51%9.13%8.41%7.09%6.25%5.16%47.17%4.46%5.60%7.00%5.96%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.71%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%2.48%

Drawdowns

CICHF vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CICHF drawdown since its inception was -90.82%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CICHF and MSFT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CICHF vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

China Construction Bank Corporation (CICHF) has a higher volatility of 11.29% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 8.07%. This indicates that CICHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CICHF vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Construction Bank Corporation and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00B200.00B300.00B400.00B20212022202320242025
190.07B
70.07B
(CICHF) Total Revenue
(MSFT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CICHF vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between China Construction Bank Corporation and Microsoft Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

65.0%70.0%75.0%80.0%85.0%90.0%95.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
68.7%
(CICHF) Gross Margin
(MSFT) Gross Margin
CICHF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, China Construction Bank Corporation reported a gross profit of 190.07B and revenue of 190.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 48.15B and revenue of 70.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.7%.

CICHF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, China Construction Bank Corporation reported an operating income of 141.65B and revenue of 190.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 74.5%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 32.00B and revenue of 70.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.7%.

CICHF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, China Construction Bank Corporation reported a net income of 83.35B and revenue of 190.07B, resulting in a net margin of 43.9%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 25.82B and revenue of 70.07B, resulting in a net margin of 36.9%.