PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CICHF vs. VZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CICHF vs. VZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in China Construction Bank Corporation (CICHF) and Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CICHF achieves a 4.27% return, which is significantly lower than VZ's 18.27% return. Over the past 10 years, CICHF has outperformed VZ with an annualized return of 22.00%, while VZ has yielded a comparatively lower 4.53% annualized return.


CICHF

1D
-5.44%
1M
-14.50%
YTD
4.27%
6M
-3.21%
1Y
9.01%
3Y*
27.15%
5Y*
12.46%
10Y*
22.00%

VZ

1D
-2.55%
1M
-1.93%
YTD
18.27%
6M
18.45%
1Y
13.60%
3Y*
18.19%
5Y*
2.11%
10Y*
4.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CICHF vs. VZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CICHF
China Construction Bank Corporation
4.27%22.19%58.20%-0.14%-8.94%4.95%-12.31%11.35%-10.33%105.09%
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
18.27%8.86%13.14%2.71%-20.02%-7.55%-0.13%13.83%11.26%3.97%

Correlation

The correlation between CICHF and VZ is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2006

0.08

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CICHF:

$34.23B

VZ:

$196.40B

EPS

CICHF:

$3.88

VZ:

$4.10

PE Ratio

CICHF:

0.26

VZ:

11.37

PS Ratio

CICHF:

0.08

VZ:

1.42

PB Ratio

CICHF:

0.01

VZ:

1.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

CICHF:

$1.14T

VZ:

$139.15B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CICHF:

$701.45B

VZ:

$81.89B

EBITDA (TTM)

CICHF:

$397.42B

VZ:

$48.65B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CICHF vs. VZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CICHF
CICHF Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
CICHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CICHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
CICHF Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
CICHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CICHF Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

VZ
VZ Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
VZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CICHF vs. VZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Construction Bank Corporation (CICHF) and Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CICHFVZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.14

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

1.03

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.90

2.22

-1.33

CICHF vs. VZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CICHF Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the VZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CICHF and VZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CICHFVZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

0.61

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.10

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.22

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.23

+0.11

Drawdowns

CICHF vs. VZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CICHF drawdown since its inception was -72.65%, which is greater than VZ's maximum drawdown of -50.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CICHF and VZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CICHFVZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.65%

-50.66%

-21.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.11%

-13.32%

-5.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.11%

-14.93%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.97%

-38.38%

+6.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.43%

-41.21%

-4.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.50%

-7.84%

-6.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.85%

-14.75%

-8.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.04%

6.13%

+3.91%

Volatility

CICHF vs. VZ - Volatility Comparison

China Construction Bank Corporation (CICHF) has a higher volatility of 33.27% compared to Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) at 4.69%. This indicates that CICHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CICHFVZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.27%

4.69%

+28.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.15%

17.48%

+35.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.45%

22.27%

+48.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.01%

21.54%

+27.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.16%

20.31%

+36.85%

Dividends

CICHF vs. VZ - Dividend Comparison

CICHF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.93%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CICHF
China Construction Bank Corporation
0.00%5.69%6.51%9.14%0.00%7.05%6.25%5.17%0.00%34.73%43.08%55.64%
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
5.93%6.68%6.68%6.96%6.53%4.85%4.21%3.95%4.22%4.39%4.26%4.79%

Financials

CICHF vs. VZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Construction Bank Corporation and Verizon Communications Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00B200.00B300.00B400.00B20222023202420252026
345.57B
34.44B
(CICHF) Total Revenue
(VZ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CICHF vs. VZ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between China Construction Bank Corporation and Verizon Communications Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
43.8%
60.3%
Portfolio components
CICHF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Construction Bank Corporation reported a gross profit of 151.30B and revenue of 345.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.8%.

VZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verizon Communications Inc. reported a gross profit of 20.77B and revenue of 34.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.3%.

CICHF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Construction Bank Corporation reported an operating income of 98.25B and revenue of 345.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.

VZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verizon Communications Inc. reported an operating income of 8.24B and revenue of 34.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.9%.

CICHF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Construction Bank Corporation reported a net income of 85.47B and revenue of 345.57B, resulting in a net margin of 24.7%.

VZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verizon Communications Inc. reported a net income of 5.05B and revenue of 34.44B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CICHF and VZ have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CICHF has higher volatility (33.27%) compared to VZ (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CICHF dropped -72.65% vs VZ's -50.66%.

VZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CICHF and VZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer