PortfoliosLab logo
CICHF vs. SBERP.ME
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CICHF and SBERP.ME is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CICHF vs. SBERP.ME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in China Construction Bank Corporation (CICHF) and Sberbank of Russia (SBERP.ME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CICHF:

0.87

SBERP.ME:

-0.20

Sortino Ratio

CICHF:

1.67

SBERP.ME:

-0.16

Omega Ratio

CICHF:

1.20

SBERP.ME:

0.98

Calmar Ratio

CICHF:

2.68

SBERP.ME:

-0.20

Martin Ratio

CICHF:

8.64

SBERP.ME:

-0.38

Ulcer Index

CICHF:

8.40%

SBERP.ME:

16.64%

Daily Std Dev

CICHF:

74.22%

SBERP.ME:

27.35%

Max Drawdown

CICHF:

-90.82%

SBERP.ME:

-91.05%

Current Drawdown

CICHF:

-2.22%

SBERP.ME:

-7.91%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CICHF:

$224.21B

SBERP.ME:

RUB 2.72T

EPS

CICHF:

$0.18

SBERP.ME:

RUB 50.40

PE Ratio

CICHF:

4.89

SBERP.ME:

2.51

PEG Ratio

CICHF:

1.91

SBERP.ME:

0.00

PS Ratio

CICHF:

0.37

SBERP.ME:

1.12

PB Ratio

CICHF:

0.47

SBERP.ME:

0.48

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CICHF achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly higher than SBERP.ME's 8.49% return. Over the past 10 years, CICHF has underperformed SBERP.ME with an annualized return of 12.03%, while SBERP.ME has yielded a comparatively higher 26.30% annualized return.


CICHF

YTD

9.70%

1M

6.22%

6M

29.13%

1Y

36.67%

3Y*

20.50%

5Y*

11.38%

10Y*

12.03%

SBERP.ME

YTD

8.49%

1M

1.23%

6M

26.02%

1Y

-5.41%

3Y*

41.78%

5Y*

17.93%

10Y*

26.30%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Sberbank of Russia

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CICHF vs. SBERP.ME — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CICHF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CICHF is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CICHF is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CICHF is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CICHF is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CICHF is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CICHF is 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

SBERP.ME
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SBERP.ME is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SBERP.ME is 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SBERP.ME is 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SBERP.ME is 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SBERP.ME is 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SBERP.ME is 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CICHF vs. SBERP.ME - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Construction Bank Corporation (CICHF) and Sberbank of Russia (SBERP.ME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CICHF Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the SBERP.ME Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CICHF and SBERP.ME, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CICHF vs. SBERP.ME - Dividend Comparison

CICHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.73%, while SBERP.ME has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CICHF
China Construction Bank Corporation
12.73%6.51%9.13%8.41%7.09%6.25%5.16%47.17%4.46%5.60%7.00%5.96%
SBERP.ME
Sberbank of Russia
0.00%0.00%9.17%0.00%6.72%7.77%7.01%7.22%3.17%1.52%0.59%8.49%

Drawdowns

CICHF vs. SBERP.ME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CICHF drawdown since its inception was -90.82%, roughly equal to the maximum SBERP.ME drawdown of -91.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CICHF and SBERP.ME. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CICHF vs. SBERP.ME - Volatility Comparison

China Construction Bank Corporation (CICHF) has a higher volatility of 11.29% compared to Sberbank of Russia (SBERP.ME) at 7.97%. This indicates that CICHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBERP.ME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CICHF vs. SBERP.ME - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Construction Bank Corporation and Sberbank of Russia. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00B300.00B400.00B500.00B600.00B700.00B800.00B20212022202320242025
190.07B
787.80B
(CICHF) Total Revenue
(SBERP.ME) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CICHF values in USD, SBERP.ME values in RUB