PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CICHF vs. SBER.ME
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CICHF and SBER.ME is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.1

Performance

CICHF vs. SBER.ME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in China Construction Bank Corporation (CICHF) and Sberbank of Russia (SBER.ME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%700.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
634.42%
174.72%
CICHF
SBER.ME

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CICHF:

1.08

SBER.ME:

0.35

Sortino Ratio

CICHF:

1.72

SBER.ME:

0.76

Omega Ratio

CICHF:

1.22

SBER.ME:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

CICHF:

2.68

SBER.ME:

0.33

Martin Ratio

CICHF:

12.42

SBER.ME:

0.89

Ulcer Index

CICHF:

5.84%

SBER.ME:

10.46%

Daily Std Dev

CICHF:

71.41%

SBER.ME:

26.70%

Max Drawdown

CICHF:

-90.95%

SBER.ME:

-87.29%

Current Drawdown

CICHF:

-5.49%

SBER.ME:

-8.31%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CICHF:

$218.95B

SBER.ME:

RUB 6.33T

EPS

CICHF:

$0.18

SBER.ME:

RUB 56.88

PE Ratio

CICHF:

4.78

SBER.ME:

10.46

PEG Ratio

CICHF:

1.89

SBER.ME:

0.56

PS Ratio

CICHF:

0.36

SBER.ME:

1.24

PB Ratio

CICHF:

0.49

SBER.ME:

0.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

CICHF:

$714.27B

SBER.ME:

RUB 5.04T

Gross Profit (TTM)

CICHF:

$714.27B

SBER.ME:

RUB 3.53T

EBITDA (TTM)

CICHF:

$5.32B

SBER.ME:

RUB 1.53T

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CICHF achieves a 3.42% return, which is significantly lower than SBER.ME's 7.71% return. Over the past 10 years, CICHF has underperformed SBER.ME with an annualized return of 16.57%, while SBER.ME has yielded a comparatively higher 21.60% annualized return.


CICHF

YTD

3.42%

1M

-2.27%

6M

18.59%

1Y

51.65%

5Y*

18.09%

10Y*

16.57%

SBER.ME

YTD

7.71%

1M

-6.61%

6M

17.28%

1Y

9.27%

5Y*

18.86%

10Y*

21.60%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CICHF vs. SBER.ME — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CICHF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CICHF is 8989
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CICHF is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CICHF is 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CICHF is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CICHF is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CICHF is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

SBER.ME
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SBER.ME is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SBER.ME is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SBER.ME is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SBER.ME is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SBER.ME is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SBER.ME is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CICHF vs. SBER.ME - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Construction Bank Corporation (CICHF) and Sberbank of Russia (SBER.ME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CICHF, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
CICHF: 1.09
SBER.ME: 0.55
The chart of Sortino ratio for CICHF, currently valued at 1.72, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
CICHF: 1.72
SBER.ME: 1.13
The chart of Omega ratio for CICHF, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
CICHF: 1.30
SBER.ME: 1.13
The chart of Calmar ratio for CICHF, currently valued at 3.77, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.00
CICHF: 3.77
SBER.ME: 0.40
The chart of Martin ratio for CICHF, currently valued at 9.99, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
CICHF: 9.99
SBER.ME: 1.17

The current CICHF Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is higher than the SBER.ME Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CICHF and SBER.ME, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1.09
0.55
CICHF
SBER.ME

Dividends

CICHF vs. SBER.ME - Dividend Comparison

CICHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.65%, less than SBER.ME's 11.07% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CICHF
China Construction Bank Corporation
9.65%6.51%9.13%8.41%7.09%6.25%5.16%47.17%4.46%5.60%7.00%5.96%
SBER.ME
Sberbank of Russia
11.07%11.92%9.20%0.00%6.37%6.90%6.28%6.44%2.66%1.14%0.44%5.83%

Drawdowns

CICHF vs. SBER.ME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CICHF drawdown since its inception was -90.95%, roughly equal to the maximum SBER.ME drawdown of -87.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CICHF and SBER.ME. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-5.49%
-14.05%
CICHF
SBER.ME

Volatility

CICHF vs. SBER.ME - Volatility Comparison

China Construction Bank Corporation (CICHF) has a higher volatility of 16.74% compared to Sberbank of Russia (SBER.ME) at 11.59%. This indicates that CICHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBER.ME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
16.74%
11.59%
CICHF
SBER.ME

Financials

CICHF vs. SBER.ME - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Construction Bank Corporation and Sberbank of Russia. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. CICHF values in USD, SBER.ME values in RUB
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab