BYDDY vs. IDCBY
Compare and contrast key facts about BYD Company Limited ADR (BYDDY) and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY).
Performance
BYDDY vs. IDCBY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BYDDY vs. IDCBY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYDDY BYD Company Limited ADR | 9.99% | 7.97% | 24.81% | 13.06% | -27.17% | 28.02% | 432.95% | -21.04% | -27.71% | 69.09% |
IDCBY Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited | 8.84% | 32.13% | 47.21% | 3.91% | -2.05% | -6.39% | -12.54% | 13.02% | -8.08% | 42.02% |
Fundamentals
BYDDY:
$121.43B
IDCBY:
$312.57B
BYDDY:
$3.60
IDCBY:
$19.94
BYDDY:
3.70
IDCBY:
0.88
BYDDY:
0.03
IDCBY:
1.10
BYDDY:
0.15
IDCBY:
0.21
BYDDY:
0.53
IDCBY:
0.08
BYDDY:
$799.66B
IDCBY:
$1.49T
BYDDY:
$138.56B
IDCBY:
$665.53B
BYDDY:
$39.74B
IDCBY:
$429.60B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BYDDY achieves a 9.99% return, which is significantly higher than IDCBY's 8.84% return. Over the past 10 years, BYDDY has outperformed IDCBY with an annualized return of 22.47%, while IDCBY has yielded a comparatively lower 12.36% annualized return.
BYDDY
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- 9.99%
- 6M
- -5.87%
- 1Y
- -18.23%
- 3Y*
- 11.85%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 22.47%
IDCBY
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 8.34%
- YTD
- 8.84%
- 6M
- 22.14%
- 1Y
- 31.01%
- 3Y*
- 28.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.53%
- 10Y*
- 12.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BYDDY vs. IDCBY — Risk / Return Rank
BYDDY
IDCBY
BYDDY vs. IDCBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BYD Company Limited ADR (BYDDY) and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BYDDY | IDCBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | 1.56 | -1.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | 2.20 | -2.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.27 | -0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 2.45 | -2.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.72 | 7.54 | -8.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BYDDY | IDCBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.43 | 1.56 | -1.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.59 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.54 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.15 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between BYDDY and IDCBY is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BYDDY vs. IDCBY - Dividend Comparison
BYDDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than IDCBY's 4.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYDDY BYD Company Limited ADR | 1.32% | 1.45% | 1.26% | 0.60% | 0.07% | 0.07% | 0.03% | 0.47% | 0.28% | 0.52% | 1.92% | 0.00% |
IDCBY Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited | 4.88% | 7.76% | 6.36% | 8.69% | 8.61% | 7.32% | 4.84% | 3.91% | 4.48% | 3.49% | 12.32% | 7.11% |
Drawdowns
BYDDY vs. IDCBY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BYDDY drawdown since its inception was -97.38%, which is greater than IDCBY's maximum drawdown of -78.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYDDY and IDCBY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BYDDY | IDCBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.38% | -78.73% | -18.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.29% | -12.37% | -29.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.16% | -30.39% | -17.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.18% | -39.70% | -18.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.80% | -3.11% | -28.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.07% | -49.49% | -14.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.38% | 4.02% | +24.36% |
Volatility
BYDDY vs. IDCBY - Volatility Comparison
BYD Company Limited ADR (BYDDY) has a higher volatility of 16.03% compared to Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) at 6.05%. This indicates that BYDDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDCBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BYDDY | IDCBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.03% | 6.05% | +9.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.76% | 13.05% | +14.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.95% | 19.96% | +22.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.20% | 21.29% | +24.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.20% | 22.97% | +24.23% |
Financials
BYDDY vs. IDCBY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BYD Company Limited ADR and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BYDDY vs. IDCBY - Profitability Comparison
BYDDY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BYD Company Limited ADR reported a gross profit of 37.53B and revenue of 234.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.0%.
IDCBY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported a gross profit of 360.46B and revenue of 745.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.4%.
BYDDY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BYD Company Limited ADR reported an operating income of 9.51B and revenue of 234.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.1%.
IDCBY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported an operating income of 67.55B and revenue of 745.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.
BYDDY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BYD Company Limited ADR reported a net income of 9.16B and revenue of 234.42B, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.
IDCBY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported a net income of 89.14B and revenue of 745.00B, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.