PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BYDDY vs. IDCBY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


BYDDYIDCBY
YTD Return3.22%16.77%
1Y Return-8.41%9.60%
3Y Return (Ann)15.79%3.19%
5Y Return (Ann)36.37%2.21%
10Y Return (Ann)19.09%5.45%
Sharpe Ratio-0.220.63
Daily Std Dev33.96%20.42%
Max Drawdown-87.26%-45.80%
Current Drawdown-32.10%-11.42%

Fundamentals


BYDDYIDCBY
Market Cap$88.59B$251.94B
EPS$2.90$2.69
PE Ratio19.584.28
PEG Ratio0.800.59
Revenue (TTM)$607.09B$653.59B
Gross Profit (TTM)$71.41B$735.57B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between BYDDY and IDCBY is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

BYDDY vs. IDCBY - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BYDDY achieves a 3.22% return, which is significantly lower than IDCBY's 16.77% return. Over the past 10 years, BYDDY has outperformed IDCBY with an annualized return of 19.09%, while IDCBY has yielded a comparatively lower 5.45% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%500.00%1,000.00%1,500.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1,458.15%
216.23%
BYDDY
IDCBY

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BYD Co Ltd ADR

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BYDDY vs. IDCBY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BYD Co Ltd ADR (BYDDY) and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BYDDY
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BYDDY, currently valued at -0.22, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.22
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BYDDY, currently valued at -0.09, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.09
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BYDDY, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.99
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BYDDY, currently valued at -0.16, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.16
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BYDDY, currently valued at -0.37, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.37
IDCBY
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IDCBY, currently valued at 0.63, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.63
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for IDCBY, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.00
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for IDCBY, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.12
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for IDCBY, currently valued at 0.39, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.39
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for IDCBY, currently valued at 1.57, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.57

BYDDY vs. IDCBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BYDDY Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the IDCBY Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of BYDDY and IDCBY.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.22
0.63
BYDDY
IDCBY

Dividends

BYDDY vs. IDCBY - Dividend Comparison

BYDDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than IDCBY's 7.41% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BYDDY
BYD Co Ltd ADR
0.57%0.58%0.06%0.07%0.03%0.59%0.34%0.30%1.03%0.00%0.21%0.00%
IDCBY
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited
7.41%8.65%8.59%7.27%5.79%4.71%5.37%4.25%6.08%6.88%5.82%5.71%

Drawdowns

BYDDY vs. IDCBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BYDDY drawdown since its inception was -87.26%, which is greater than IDCBY's maximum drawdown of -45.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYDDY and IDCBY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-32.10%
-11.42%
BYDDY
IDCBY

Volatility

BYDDY vs. IDCBY - Volatility Comparison

BYD Co Ltd ADR (BYDDY) has a higher volatility of 9.81% compared to Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) at 5.42%. This indicates that BYDDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDCBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
9.81%
5.42%
BYDDY
IDCBY

Financials

BYDDY vs. IDCBY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BYD Co Ltd ADR and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items