CIBR vs. TSXU
CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) and TSXU (Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - CIBR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, while TSXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). Both are passively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CIBR charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSXU.
Performance
CIBR vs. TSXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIBR achieves a 28.52% return, which is significantly lower than TSXU's 141.91% return.
CIBR
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 31.43%
- YTD
- 28.52%
- 6M
- 24.03%
- 1Y
- 25.78%
- 3Y*
- 28.32%
- 5Y*
- 16.28%
- 10Y*
- 18.49%
TSXU
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 66.50%
- YTD
- 141.91%
- 6M
- 130.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIBR vs. TSXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 28.52% | -6.38% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 141.91% | 13.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIBR and TSXU is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIBR vs. TSXU — Risk / Return Rank
CIBR
TSXU
CIBR vs. TSXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIBR | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.79 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIBR | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 4.53 | -3.87 |
Drawdowns
CIBR vs. TSXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIBR drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, roughly equal to the maximum TSXU drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR and TSXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIBR | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.89% | -35.62% | +1.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -0.92% | -1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.66% | -10.56% | +1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.25% | — | — |
Volatility
CIBR vs. TSXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIBR | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.90% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.90% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.50% | 78.68% | -54.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.95% | 78.68% | -53.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.60% | 78.68% | -55.08% |
CIBR vs. TSXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIBR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than TSXU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIBR vs. TSXU - Dividend Comparison
CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than TSXU's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.45% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 1.20% | 2.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIBR and TSXU have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSXU.
TSXU has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.45% for CIBR.
CIBR is categorized as Technology Equities, while TSXU is Leveraged Equities. CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, while TSXU tracks Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CIBR and 1.05% for TSXU.
Find the right allocation for CIBR and TSXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer