CIBR vs. NFTY
CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) and NFTY (First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CIBR is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, while NFTY is a India Equities fund tracking the NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CIBR returned 18.35%/yr vs 7.23%/yr for NFTY. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CIBR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for NFTY.
Performance
CIBR vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIBR achieves a 28.94% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, CIBR has outperformed NFTY with an annualized return of 18.35%, while NFTY has yielded a comparatively lower 7.23% annualized return.
CIBR
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 8.10%
- 6M
- 27.76%
- YTD
- 28.94%
- 1Y
- 25.97%
- 3Y*
- 26.27%
- 5Y*
- 14.79%
- 10Y*
- 18.35%
NFTY
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- 6M
- -7.54%
- YTD
- -8.35%
- 1Y
- -9.06%
- 3Y*
- 4.29%
- 5Y*
- 5.57%
- 10Y*
- 7.23%
CIBR vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 28.94% | 13.06% | 18.21% | 39.71% | -26.46% | 19.67% | 50.53% | 28.52% | 1.47% | 18.61% |
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | -8.35% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 24.00% | -3.46% | 26.83% | 10.04% | 0.58% | -1.51% | 21.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIBR and NFTY is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015 | 0.28 |
The correlation between CIBR and NFTY shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CIBR vs. NFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CIBR
NFTY
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
CIBR
NFTY
Industrials
CIBR
NFTY
Communication Services
CIBR
NFTY
Basic Materials
CIBR
-
NFTY
Consumer Cyclical
CIBR
-
NFTY
Consumer Defensive
CIBR
-
NFTY
Energy
CIBR
-
NFTY
Financial Services
CIBR
-
NFTY
Healthcare
CIBR
-
NFTY
Real Estate
CIBR
-
NFTY
-
Utilities
CIBR
-
NFTY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIBR vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank
CIBR
NFTY
CIBR vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CIBR | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.91 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.19 | -0.56 | +1.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.75 | -1.34 | +4.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIBR vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIBR drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, smaller than the maximum NFTY drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR and NFTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIBR | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.89% | -47.67% | +13.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.99% | -16.14% | -5.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.99% | -21.55% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.89% | -21.55% | -12.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.89% | -47.67% | +13.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.00% | -16.22% | +13.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.64% | -9.63% | +0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.47% | 6.82% | +2.65% |
Volatility
CIBR vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a higher volatility of 7.96% compared to First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) at 3.01%. This indicates that CIBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIBR | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.96% | 3.01% | +4.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.49% | 12.58% | +9.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.77% | 14.72% | +11.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.26% | 17.40% | +7.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.62% | 20.64% | +2.98% |
CIBR vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIBR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIBR vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison
CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than NFTY's 1.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.43% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | 1.93% | 1.24% | 1.61% | 0.13% | 5.89% | 1.53% | 0.61% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 4.10% | 3.28% | 4.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIBR and NFTY have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIBR has higher volatility (7.96%) compared to NFTY (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIBR dropped -33.89% vs NFTY's -47.67%.
On 10-year performance, CIBR leads with 18.35% vs 7.23% for NFTY. On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, NFTY has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 18.35% return vs 7.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for NFTY.
NFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 0.43% for CIBR.
CIBR is categorized as Cybersecurity, while NFTY is India Equities. CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, while NFTY tracks NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CIBR and 0.80% for NFTY.
CIBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CIBR and NFTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer