CIBR vs. LOCK.L
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Acc (LOCK.L).
CIBR and LOCK.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CIBR is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. It was launched on Jul 7, 2015. LOCK.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Sep 7, 2018. Both CIBR and LOCK.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CIBR vs. LOCK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CIBR vs. LOCK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | -12.12% | 13.06% | 18.21% | 39.71% | -26.46% | 19.67% | 50.53% | 28.52% | -18.12% |
LOCK.L iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Acc | -7.37% | 11.36% | 16.83% | 33.97% | -29.10% | 16.48% | 26.98% | 28.45% | -12.58% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIBR achieves a -12.12% return, which is significantly lower than LOCK.L's -7.37% return.
CIBR
- 1D
- 3.11%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- -12.12%
- 6M
- -17.17%
- 1Y
- 0.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.11%
- 5Y*
- 8.62%
- 10Y*
- 14.52%
LOCK.L
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- YTD
- -7.37%
- 6M
- -8.56%
- 1Y
- 10.08%
- 3Y*
- 13.47%
- 5Y*
- 5.64%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CIBR vs. LOCK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIBR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than LOCK.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CIBR vs. LOCK.L — Risk / Return Rank
CIBR
LOCK.L
CIBR vs. LOCK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Acc (LOCK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIBR | LOCK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | 0.48 | -0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.17 | 0.79 | -0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.10 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | 0.71 | -0.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.07 | 1.70 | -1.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIBR | LOCK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 | 0.48 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.27 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.42 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between CIBR and LOCK.L is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CIBR vs. LOCK.L - Dividend Comparison
CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while LOCK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.65% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
LOCK.L iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CIBR vs. LOCK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIBR drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, smaller than the maximum LOCK.L drawdown of -36.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR and LOCK.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIBR | LOCK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.89% | -36.04% | +2.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.96% | -11.90% | -10.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.89% | -36.04% | +2.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.50% | -11.65% | -7.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.66% | -9.77% | +1.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.02% | 4.99% | +3.03% |
Volatility
CIBR vs. LOCK.L - Volatility Comparison
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a higher volatility of 7.04% compared to iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Acc (LOCK.L) at 6.27%. This indicates that CIBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LOCK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CIBR | LOCK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.04% | 6.27% | +0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.45% | 14.16% | +2.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.46% | 20.82% | +3.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.21% | 20.61% | +3.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.22% | 20.91% | +2.31% |