LOCK.L vs. CIBR.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Acc (LOCK.L) and First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (CIBR.L).
LOCK.L and CIBR.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LOCK.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Sep 7, 2018. CIBR.L is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on May 27, 2020. Both LOCK.L and CIBR.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LOCK.L or CIBR.L.
Key characteristics
| LOCK.L | CIBR.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 8.94% | 6.95% |
| 1Y Return | 22.08% | 24.91% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.54% | 4.47% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.25 | 1.27 |
| Daily Std Dev | 17.78% | 19.62% |
| Max Drawdown | -36.04% | -33.69% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.59% | -2.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOCK.L and CIBR.L is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
LOCK.L vs. CIBR.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LOCK.L achieves a 8.94% return, which is significantly higher than CIBR.L's 6.95% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LOCK.L vs. CIBR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOCK.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CIBR.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LOCK.L vs. CIBR.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Acc (LOCK.L) and First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (CIBR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LOCK.L vs. CIBR.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LOCK.L nor CIBR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
LOCK.L vs. CIBR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOCK.L drawdown since its inception was -36.04%, which is greater than CIBR.L's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOCK.L and CIBR.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LOCK.L vs. CIBR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Acc (LOCK.L) is 4.50%, while First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (CIBR.L) has a volatility of 5.70%. This indicates that LOCK.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.