PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIBR vs. INTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIBR vs. INTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Intel Corporation (INTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIBR achieves a 19.63% return, which is significantly lower than INTC's 237.59% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CIBR having a 17.88% annualized return and INTC not far behind at 17.03%.


CIBR

1D
-0.16%
1M
12.50%
YTD
19.63%
6M
15.68%
1Y
17.38%
3Y*
24.30%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
17.88%

INTC

1D
6.51%
1M
3.56%
YTD
237.59%
6M
229.46%
1Y
499.76%
3Y*
55.34%
5Y*
18.67%
10Y*
17.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIBR vs. INTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
19.63%13.06%18.21%39.71%-26.46%19.67%50.53%28.52%1.47%18.61%
INTC
Intel Corporation
237.59%84.04%-59.57%94.56%-46.64%6.05%-14.69%30.71%4.23%30.87%

Correlation

The correlation between CIBR and INTC is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015

0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between CIBR and INTC has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIBR vs. INTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIBR
CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

INTC
INTC Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
INTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTC Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
INTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTC Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIBR vs. INTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Intel Corporation (INTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIBRINTCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.67

-0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

20.85

-20.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.86

48.84

-46.98

CIBR vs. INTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIBR Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the INTC Sharpe Ratio of 6.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIBR and INTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CIBR vs. INTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIBR drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, smaller than the maximum INTC drawdown of -82.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR and INTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIBRINTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.89%

-82.25%

+48.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.99%

-24.17%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.99%

-63.80%

+41.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.89%

-65.95%

+32.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.89%

-70.80%

+36.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.53%

-3.76%

-5.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.66%

-36.66%

+28.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.38%

10.30%

-0.92%

Volatility

CIBR vs. INTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) is 12.35%, while Intel Corporation (INTC) has a volatility of 24.56%. This indicates that CIBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIBRINTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.35%

24.56%

-12.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.72%

58.47%

-36.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.16%

73.69%

-48.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.04%

52.29%

-27.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.65%

44.20%

-20.55%

Dividends

CIBR vs. INTC - Dividend Comparison

CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, while INTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
0.48%0.42%0.29%0.42%0.31%0.59%1.10%0.23%0.23%0.10%0.77%0.58%
INTC
Intel Corporation
0.00%0.00%1.87%1.47%5.52%2.70%2.65%2.11%2.56%2.33%2.87%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


CIBR and INTC have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INTC has higher volatility (24.56%) compared to CIBR (12.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIBR dropped -33.89% vs INTC's -82.25%.

INTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.84 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIBR and INTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer