CIBR vs. BDRY
CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) and BDRY (Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CIBR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, while BDRY is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Dry Freight Futures Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CIBR returned 16.28%/yr vs -11.69%/yr for BDRY. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CIBR charges 0.60%/yr vs 3.76%/yr for BDRY.
Performance
CIBR vs. BDRY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIBR achieves a 28.52% return, which is significantly lower than BDRY's 43.90% return.
CIBR
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 31.43%
- YTD
- 28.52%
- 6M
- 24.03%
- 1Y
- 25.78%
- 3Y*
- 28.32%
- 5Y*
- 16.28%
- 10Y*
- 18.49%
BDRY
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- 7.04%
- YTD
- 43.90%
- 6M
- 35.70%
- 1Y
- 142.69%
- 3Y*
- 27.14%
- 5Y*
- -11.69%
- 10Y*
- —
CIBR vs. BDRY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 28.52% | 13.06% | 18.21% | 39.71% | -26.46% | 19.67% | 50.53% | 28.52% | -6.55% |
BDRY Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF | 43.90% | 44.24% | -47.40% | 25.79% | -68.84% | 282.99% | -50.16% | -15.92% | -27.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIBR and BDRY is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2018 | 0.02 |
CIBR vs. BDRY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CIBR
BDRY
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
CIBR
BDRY
-
Industrials
CIBR
BDRY
-
Communication Services
CIBR
BDRY
-
Basic Materials
CIBR
-
BDRY
-
Consumer Cyclical
CIBR
-
BDRY
-
Consumer Defensive
CIBR
-
BDRY
-
Energy
CIBR
-
BDRY
-
Financial Services
CIBR
-
BDRY
Healthcare
CIBR
-
BDRY
-
Real Estate
CIBR
-
BDRY
-
Utilities
CIBR
-
BDRY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIBR vs. BDRY — Risk / Return Rank
CIBR
BDRY
CIBR vs. BDRY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIBR | BDRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.45 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 6.65 | -5.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.79 | 19.36 | -16.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIBR | BDRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 3.40 | -2.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | -0.19 | +0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | -0.13 | +0.80 |
Drawdowns
CIBR vs. BDRY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIBR drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, smaller than the maximum BDRY drawdown of -89.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR and BDRY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIBR | BDRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.89% | -89.16% | +55.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.99% | -21.60% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.99% | -69.71% | +47.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.89% | -89.16% | +55.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -69.60% | +66.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.66% | -58.38% | +49.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.25% | 7.40% | +1.85% |
Volatility
CIBR vs. BDRY - Volatility Comparison
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY) have volatilities of 10.90% and 11.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIBR | BDRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.90% | 11.26% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.90% | 30.02% | -9.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.50% | 42.29% | -17.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.95% | 60.70% | -35.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.60% | 62.58% | -38.98% |
CIBR vs. BDRY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIBR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BDRY's 3.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIBR vs. BDRY - Dividend Comparison
CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, while BDRY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDRY Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.45% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIBR and BDRY have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BDRY has higher volatility (11.26%) compared to CIBR (10.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIBR dropped -33.89% vs BDRY's -89.16%.
On 5-year performance, CIBR leads with 16.28% vs -11.69% for BDRY. On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, CIBR has been the lower-risk option at 10.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 16.28% return vs -11.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 3.76% for BDRY.
CIBR has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.00% for BDRY.
CIBR is categorized as Technology Equities, while BDRY is Commodities. CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, while BDRY tracks Breakwave Dry Freight Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ETFMG. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CIBR and 3.76% for BDRY.
BDRY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.40 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CIBR and BDRY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer