CIBR vs. ACLO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) and ACLO (TCW AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CIBR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, while ACLO is a CLO fund actively managed by TCW. CIBR is passively managed, while ACLO is actively managed. Over the past year, CIBR returned 25.78% vs 5.31% for ACLO. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CIBR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACLO.

Performance

CIBR vs. ACLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIBR achieves a 28.52% return, which is significantly higher than ACLO's 2.21% return.

CIBR

• 1D: -2.81%
• 1M: 31.43%
• YTD: 28.52%
• 6M: 24.03%
• 1Y: 25.78%
• 3Y*: 28.32%
• 5Y*: 16.28%
• 10Y*: 18.49%

ACLO

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 2.21%
• 6M: 2.58%
• 1Y: 5.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIBR vs. ACLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	28.52%	13.06%	3.60%
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF	2.21%	5.32%	0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between CIBR and ACLO is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2024	0.02

Return for Risk

CIBR vs. ACLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIBR

CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 26
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 29
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 22

ACLO

ACLO Risk / Return Rank: 99
ACLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIBR vs. ACLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CIBR	ACLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	7.29	-6.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	14.85	-13.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	3.41	-2.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.18	19.90	-18.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.79	164.37	-161.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CIBR vs. ACLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIBR Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the ACLO Sharpe Ratio of 7.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIBR and ACLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CIBR	ACLO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	7.29	-6.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	5.10	-4.43

Drawdowns

CIBR vs. ACLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIBR drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, which is greater than ACLO's maximum drawdown of -1.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR and ACLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIBR	ACLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.89%	-1.01%	-32.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.99%	-0.27%	-21.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.99%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.81%	0.00%	-2.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.66%	-0.05%	-8.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.25%	0.03%	+9.22%

Volatility

CIBR vs. ACLO - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a higher volatility of 10.90% compared to TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) at 0.14%. This indicates that CIBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CIBR	ACLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.90%	0.14%	+10.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.90%	0.57%	+20.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.50%	0.73%	+23.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.95%	1.08%	+23.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.60%	1.08%	+22.52%

CIBR vs. ACLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIBR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ACLO's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

CIBR vs. ACLO - Dividend Comparison

CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than ACLO's 4.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF	4.91%	4.87%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.45%	0.42%	0.29%	0.42%	0.31%	0.59%	1.10%	0.23%	0.23%	0.10%	0.77%	0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CIBR and ACLO in my portfolio?

CIBR and ACLO have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CIBR or ACLO?

CIBR has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to ACLO (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIBR dropped -33.89% vs ACLO's -1.01%.

Which ETF is better, CIBR or ACLO?

On 1-year performance, CIBR leads with 25.78% vs 5.31% for ACLO. On fees, ACLO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ACLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CIBR or ACLO?

Over the 1-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 25.78% return vs 5.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CIBR or ACLO?

ACLO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CIBR or ACLO?

ACLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 0.45% for CIBR.

What is the main difference between CIBR and ACLO?

CIBR is categorized as Technology Equities, while ACLO is CLO. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CIBR and 0.20% for ACLO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.29 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.