CHIQ vs. MCHS

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

CHIQ (Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF) and MCHS (Matthews China Discovery Active ETF) are both China Equities funds. CHIQ is passively managed, while MCHS is actively managed. Over the past year, CHIQ returned -25.74% vs 84.27% for MCHS. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CHIQ charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for MCHS.

Performance

CHIQ vs. MCHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) and Matthews China Discovery Active ETF (MCHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHIQ achieves a -26.08% return, which is significantly lower than MCHS's 57.13% return.

CHIQ

• 1D: -2.06%
• 1M: -15.21%
• YTD: -26.08%
• 6M: -26.95%
• 1Y: -25.74%
• 3Y*: -2.12%
• 5Y*: -13.51%
• 10Y*: 5.79%

MCHS

• 1D: 3.62%
• 1M: 7.32%
• YTD: 57.13%
• 6M: 55.73%
• 1Y: 84.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHIQ vs. MCHS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF	-26.08%	13.69%	18.20%
MCHS Matthews China Discovery Active ETF	57.13%	31.19%	6.53%

Correlation

The correlation between CHIQ and MCHS is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between CHIQ and MCHS has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

CHIQ vs. MCHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CHIQ	MCHS
Consumer Cyclical	95.8%	4.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.2%	0.8%
Real Estate	0.3%	1.6%
Technology	0.3%	49.7%
Industrials	0.2%	27.8%
Basic Materials	-	8.1%
Communication Services	-	1.2%
Energy	-	6.3%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	2.1%
Utilities	-	2.1%

Return for Risk

CHIQ vs. MCHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHIQ

CHIQ Risk / Return Rank: 1
CHIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
CHIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CHIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CHIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
CHIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 0

MCHS

MCHS Risk / Return Rank: 94
MCHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
MCHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
MCHS Omega Ratio Rank: 93
MCHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
MCHS Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHIQ vs. MCHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) and Matthews China Discovery Active ETF (MCHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CHIQ	MCHS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.16	3.36	-4.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.65	4.05	-5.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	1.57	-0.75
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.73	6.97	-7.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.84	20.28	-22.12

CHIQ vs. MCHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHIQ Sharpe Ratio is -1.16, which is lower than the MCHS Sharpe Ratio of 3.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHIQ and MCHS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CHIQ vs. MCHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHIQ drawdown since its inception was -67.04%, which is greater than MCHS's maximum drawdown of -23.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHIQ and MCHS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHIQ	MCHS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.04%	-23.75%	-43.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.53%	-12.15%	-23.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.22%	-1.03%	-60.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.70%	-7.51%	-23.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.03%	4.17%	+9.86%

Volatility

CHIQ vs. MCHS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) is 6.76%, while Matthews China Discovery Active ETF (MCHS) has a volatility of 13.46%. This indicates that CHIQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHIQ	MCHS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.76%	13.46%	-6.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.27%	21.83%	-5.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.30%	25.22%	-2.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.76%	28.99%	+8.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.43%	28.99%	+3.44%

CHIQ vs. MCHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHIQ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than MCHS's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHIQ vs. MCHS - Dividend Comparison

CHIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than MCHS's 2.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF	2.00%	1.48%	2.65%	2.26%	0.38%	0.00%	0.11%	1.05%	2.71%	0.62%	1.51%	4.86%
MCHS Matthews China Discovery Active ETF	2.27%	3.56%	5.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHIQ and MCHS in my portfolio?

CHIQ and MCHS have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHIQ or MCHS?

MCHS has higher volatility (13.46%) compared to CHIQ (6.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHIQ dropped -67.04% vs MCHS's -23.75%.

Which ETF is better, CHIQ or MCHS?

On 1-year performance, MCHS leads with 84.27% vs -25.74% for CHIQ. On fees, CHIQ is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, CHIQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CHIQ or MCHS?

Over the 1-year period, MCHS has performed better with a 84.27% return vs -25.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHIQ or MCHS?

CHIQ is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for MCHS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CHIQ or MCHS?

MCHS has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 2.00% for CHIQ.

What is the main difference between CHIQ and MCHS?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Matthews. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CHIQ and 0.89% for MCHS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MCHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.