CHIQ vs. FCA

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) and First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA).

CHIQ and FCA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CHIQ is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index. It was launched on Nov 30, 2009. FCA is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ AlphaDEX China Index. It was launched on Apr 18, 2011. Both CHIQ and FCA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CHIQ vs. FCA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) and First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CHIQ vs. FCA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF	-6.89%	13.69%	10.74%	-10.70%	-22.01%	-27.07%	92.61%	44.19%	-28.65%	67.74%
FCA First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund	11.25%	45.20%	14.07%	-8.28%	-17.61%	-0.65%	11.80%	18.72%	-18.30%	60.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHIQ achieves a -6.89% return, which is significantly lower than FCA's 11.25% return. Over the past 10 years, CHIQ has underperformed FCA with an annualized return of 7.25%, while FCA has yielded a comparatively higher 9.44% annualized return.

CHIQ

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: -2.46%
• YTD: -6.89%
• 6M: -18.00%
• 1Y: -10.38%
• 3Y*: 1.51%
• 5Y*: -9.12%
• 10Y*: 7.25%

FCA

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: -8.43%
• YTD: 11.25%
• 6M: 8.59%
• 1Y: 53.44%
• 3Y*: 18.13%
• 5Y*: 6.02%
• 10Y*: 9.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHIQ vs. FCA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHIQ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FCA's 0.80% expense ratio.

FCA

First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund

CHIQ

Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF

Return for Risk

CHIQ vs. FCA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHIQ

CHIQ Risk / Return Rank: 5
CHIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
CHIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
CHIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5
CHIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
CHIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4

FCA

FCA Risk / Return Rank: 90
FCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FCA Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
FCA Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHIQ vs. FCA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) and First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CHIQ	FCA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.38	2.05	-2.44
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.36	2.54	-2.91
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.37	-0.42
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.47	3.45	-3.92
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.04	15.39	-16.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CHIQ vs. FCA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHIQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the FCA Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHIQ and FCA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHIQ	FCA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.38	2.05	-2.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.24	0.22	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22	0.36	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	0.13	-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between CHIQ and FCA is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CHIQ vs. FCA - Dividend Comparison

CHIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than FCA's 2.32% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF	1.59%	1.48%	2.65%	2.26%	0.38%	0.00%	0.11%	1.05%	2.71%	0.62%	1.51%	4.86%
FCA First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund	2.32%	2.67%	5.17%	5.70%	6.00%	4.91%	4.12%	3.73%	3.10%	2.30%	2.51%	4.13%

Drawdowns

CHIQ vs. FCA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHIQ drawdown since its inception was -67.04%, which is greater than FCA's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHIQ and FCA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHIQ	FCA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.04%	-45.56%	-21.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.18%	-15.81%	-5.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.95%	-42.47%	-17.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.04%	-42.47%	-24.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.15%	-8.43%	-42.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.39%	-21.80%	-8.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.66%	3.54%	+6.12%

Volatility

CHIQ vs. FCA - Volatility Comparison

Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) and First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA) have volatilities of 7.35% and 7.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHIQ	FCA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.35%	7.28%	+0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.54%	16.52%	+0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.25%	26.17%	+1.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.79%	27.43%	+10.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.40%	26.57%	+5.83%