CHIQ vs. FCA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CHIQ (Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF) and FCA (First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund) are both China Equities funds - CHIQ tracks the MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index while FCA tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CHIQ returned 6.73%/yr vs 9.93%/yr for FCA. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CHIQ charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FCA.

Performance

CHIQ vs. FCA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) and First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHIQ achieves a -13.71% return, which is significantly lower than FCA's 11.99% return. Over the past 10 years, CHIQ has underperformed FCA with an annualized return of 6.73%, while FCA has yielded a comparatively higher 9.93% annualized return.

CHIQ

• 1D: -2.91%
• 1M: -7.37%
• YTD: -13.71%
• 6M: -15.32%
• 1Y: -12.29%
• 3Y*: 3.13%
• 5Y*: -10.45%
• 10Y*: 6.73%

FCA

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -2.70%
• YTD: 11.99%
• 6M: 10.11%
• 1Y: 44.72%
• 3Y*: 20.23%
• 5Y*: 5.03%
• 10Y*: 9.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHIQ vs. FCA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF	-13.71%	13.69%	10.74%	-10.70%	-22.01%	-27.07%	92.61%	44.19%	-28.65%	67.74%
FCA First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund	11.99%	45.20%	14.07%	-8.28%	-17.61%	-0.65%	11.80%	18.72%	-18.30%	60.26%

Correlation

The correlation between CHIQ and FCA is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2011	0.59

The correlation between CHIQ and FCA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

CHIQ vs. FCA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CHIQ	FCA
Consumer Cyclical	96.1%	1.1%
Consumer Defensive	3.2%	0.5%
Real Estate	0.4%	1.1%
Industrials	0.2%	25.2%
Basic Materials	-	19.1%
Communication Services	-	2.9%
Energy	-	14.8%
Financial Services	-	19.7%
Healthcare	-	3.0%
Technology	-	10.3%
Utilities	-	2.4%

Return for Risk

CHIQ vs. FCA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHIQ

CHIQ Risk / Return Rank: 4
CHIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CHIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
CHIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4
CHIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
CHIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4

FCA

FCA Risk / Return Rank: 62
FCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
FCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
FCA Omega Ratio Rank: 55
FCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FCA Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHIQ vs. FCA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) and First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CHIQ	FCA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.55	2.02	-2.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.66	2.58	-3.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.34	-0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.47	4.04	-4.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.02	11.48	-12.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CHIQ vs. FCA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHIQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is lower than the FCA Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHIQ and FCA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHIQ	FCA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.55	2.02	-2.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.28	0.18	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21	0.37	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	0.13	-0.06

Drawdowns

CHIQ vs. FCA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHIQ drawdown since its inception was -67.04%, which is greater than FCA's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHIQ and FCA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHIQ	FCA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.04%	-45.56%	-21.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.10%	-11.13%	-14.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.67%	-26.13%	-3.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.95%	-42.47%	-17.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.04%	-42.47%	-24.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.73%	-8.50%	-46.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.61%	-21.62%	-8.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.12%	3.91%	+8.21%

Volatility

CHIQ vs. FCA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) is 7.26%, while First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA) has a volatility of 8.33%. This indicates that CHIQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHIQ	FCA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.26%	8.33%	-1.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.80%	16.57%	-0.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.49%	22.29%	+0.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.72%	27.59%	+10.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.44%	26.63%	+5.81%

CHIQ vs. FCA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHIQ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FCA's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHIQ vs. FCA - Dividend Comparison

CHIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than FCA's 2.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF	1.71%	1.48%	2.65%	2.26%	0.38%	0.00%	0.11%	1.05%	2.71%	0.62%	1.51%	4.86%
FCA First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund	2.30%	2.67%	5.17%	5.70%	6.00%	4.91%	4.12%	3.73%	3.10%	2.30%	2.51%	4.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHIQ and FCA in my portfolio?

CHIQ and FCA have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHIQ or FCA?

FCA has higher volatility (8.33%) compared to CHIQ (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHIQ dropped -67.04% vs FCA's -45.56%.

Which ETF is better, CHIQ or FCA?

On 10-year performance, FCA leads with 9.93% vs 6.73% for CHIQ. On fees, CHIQ is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, CHIQ has been the lower-risk option at 7.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CHIQ or FCA?

Over the 10-year period, FCA has performed better with a 9.93% return vs 6.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHIQ or FCA?

CHIQ is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FCA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CHIQ or FCA?

FCA has the higher dividend yield at 2.30%, compared with 1.71% for CHIQ.

What is the main difference between CHIQ and FCA?

CHIQ tracks MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index, while FCA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX China Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CHIQ and 0.80% for FCA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.