CHIQ vs. DRGN
CHIQ (Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF) and DRGN (Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHIQ is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index, while DRGN is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BITA China Generative AI Select Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CHIQ charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for DRGN.
Performance
CHIQ vs. DRGN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHIQ achieves a -13.71% return, which is significantly lower than DRGN's 16.56% return.
CHIQ
- 1D
- -2.91%
- 1M
- -7.37%
- YTD
- -13.71%
- 6M
- -15.32%
- 1Y
- -12.29%
- 3Y*
- 3.13%
- 5Y*
- -10.45%
- 10Y*
- 6.73%
DRGN
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 16.56%
- 6M
- 18.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHIQ vs. DRGN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF | -13.71% | -0.22% |
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF | 16.56% | 26.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHIQ and DRGN is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHIQ vs. DRGN — Risk / Return Rank
CHIQ
DRGN
CHIQ vs. DRGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) and Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHIQ | DRGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.02 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHIQ | DRGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 1.58 | -1.51 |
Drawdowns
CHIQ vs. DRGN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHIQ drawdown since its inception was -67.04%, which is greater than DRGN's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHIQ and DRGN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHIQ | DRGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.04% | -20.86% | -46.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.73% | -7.05% | -47.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.61% | -7.93% | -22.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.12% | — | — |
Volatility
CHIQ vs. DRGN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHIQ | DRGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.80% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.49% | 34.85% | -12.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.72% | 34.85% | +2.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.44% | 34.85% | -2.41% |
CHIQ vs. DRGN - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHIQ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DRGN's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHIQ vs. DRGN - Dividend Comparison
CHIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, more than DRGN's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF | 1.71% | 1.48% | 2.65% | 2.26% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 1.05% | 2.71% | 0.62% | 1.51% | 4.86% |
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF | 1.04% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHIQ and DRGN have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DRGN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRGN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CHIQ.
CHIQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 1.04% for DRGN.
CHIQ is categorized as China Equities, while DRGN is Technology Equities. CHIQ tracks MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index, while DRGN tracks BITA China Generative AI Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CHIQ and 0.39% for DRGN.
Find the right allocation for CHIQ and DRGN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer