CHIQ vs. DRGN
CHIQ (Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF) and DRGN (Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHIQ is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index, while DRGN is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BITA China Generative AI Select Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CHIQ charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for DRGN.
Performance
CHIQ vs. DRGN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHIQ achieves a -24.52% return, which is significantly lower than DRGN's 12.74% return.
CHIQ
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- -13.48%
- YTD
- -24.52%
- 6M
- -25.41%
- 1Y
- -24.60%
- 3Y*
- -1.32%
- 5Y*
- -13.15%
- 10Y*
- 5.83%
DRGN
- 1D
- -4.16%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- 12.74%
- 6M
- 14.79%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHIQ vs. DRGN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF | -24.52% | 2.06% |
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF | 12.74% | 26.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHIQ and DRGN is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHIQ vs. DRGN — Risk / Return Rank
CHIQ
DRGN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CHIQ vs. DRGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) and Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHIQ | DRGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.78 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHIQ vs. DRGN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHIQ drawdown since its inception was -67.04%, which is greater than DRGN's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHIQ and DRGN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHIQ | DRGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.04% | -20.86% | -46.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.40% | -10.09% | -50.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.69% | -8.05% | -22.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.85% | — | — |
Volatility
CHIQ vs. DRGN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHIQ | DRGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.65% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.23% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.45% | 35.21% | -12.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.75% | 35.21% | +2.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.43% | 35.21% | -2.78% |
CHIQ vs. DRGN - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHIQ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DRGN's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHIQ vs. DRGN - Dividend Comparison
CHIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than DRGN's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.65% | 2.26% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 1.05% | 2.71% | 0.62% | 1.51% | 4.86% |
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF | 1.08% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHIQ and DRGN have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DRGN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRGN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CHIQ.
CHIQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 1.08% for DRGN.
CHIQ is categorized as China Equities, while DRGN is Technology Equities. CHIQ tracks MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index, while DRGN tracks BITA China Generative AI Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CHIQ and 0.39% for DRGN.
Find the right allocation for CHIQ and DRGN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer