CHIQ vs. BOTZ
CHIQ (Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHIQ is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index, while BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CHIQ returned -13.15%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for BOTZ. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CHIQ charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.
Performance
CHIQ vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHIQ achieves a -24.52% return, which is significantly lower than BOTZ's 0.97% return.
CHIQ
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- -13.48%
- YTD
- -24.52%
- 6M
- -25.41%
- 1Y
- -24.60%
- 3Y*
- -1.32%
- 5Y*
- -13.15%
- 10Y*
- 5.83%
BOTZ
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -9.21%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- 1Y
- 17.14%
- 3Y*
- 9.77%
- 5Y*
- 1.04%
- 10Y*
- —
CHIQ vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF | -24.52% | 13.69% | 10.74% | -10.70% | -22.01% | -27.07% | 92.61% | 44.19% | -28.65% | 67.74% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.97% | 14.17% | 12.26% | 38.97% | -42.69% | 8.65% | 51.92% | 31.80% | -28.34% | 58.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHIQ and BOTZ is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2016 | 0.53 |
The correlation between CHIQ and BOTZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CHIQ vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CHIQ
BOTZ
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
CHIQ
BOTZ
Consumer Defensive
CHIQ
BOTZ
Real Estate
CHIQ
BOTZ
-
Technology
CHIQ
BOTZ
Industrials
CHIQ
BOTZ
Basic Materials
CHIQ
-
BOTZ
Communication Services
CHIQ
-
BOTZ
Energy
CHIQ
-
BOTZ
Financial Services
CHIQ
-
BOTZ
Healthcare
CHIQ
-
BOTZ
Utilities
CHIQ
-
BOTZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHIQ vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank
CHIQ
BOTZ
CHIQ vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHIQ | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.13 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | 0.89 | -1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.78 | 2.84 | -4.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHIQ vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHIQ drawdown since its inception was -67.04%, which is greater than BOTZ's maximum drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHIQ and BOTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHIQ | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.04% | -55.54% | -11.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.18% | -19.34% | -14.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.18% | -29.02% | -5.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.95% | -55.54% | -4.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.40% | -12.13% | -48.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.69% | -18.26% | -12.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.85% | 6.06% | +7.79% |
Volatility
CHIQ vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) is 6.65%, while Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) has a volatility of 9.98%. This indicates that CHIQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHIQ | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.65% | 9.98% | -3.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.23% | 20.07% | -3.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.45% | 25.53% | -3.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.75% | 27.03% | +10.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.43% | 25.83% | +6.60% |
CHIQ vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHIQ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHIQ vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
CHIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than BOTZ's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.65% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% | 0.00% |
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.65% | 2.26% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 1.05% | 2.71% | 0.62% | 1.51% | 4.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHIQ and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOTZ has higher volatility (9.98%) compared to CHIQ (6.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHIQ dropped -67.04% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.
On 5-year performance, BOTZ leads with 1.04% vs -13.15% for CHIQ. On fees, CHIQ is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, CHIQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BOTZ has performed better with a 1.04% return vs -13.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CHIQ is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.
CHIQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.65% for BOTZ.
CHIQ is categorized as China Equities, while BOTZ is Robotics. CHIQ tracks MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CHIQ and 0.68% for BOTZ.
BOTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs -1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHIQ and BOTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer