CHILX vs. ICHKX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX) and Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund (ICHKX).
CHILX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 26, 2018. ICHKX is managed by Guinness Atkinson. It was launched on Jun 29, 1994.
Performance
CHILX vs. ICHKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CHILX vs. ICHKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHILX BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund | 0.13% | 26.30% | 15.44% | -12.29% | -28.54% | 3.54% | 48.69% | 48.44% |
ICHKX Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund | -2.77% | 28.97% | 0.05% | -14.52% | -23.67% | -6.90% | 14.58% | 35.15% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHILX achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly higher than ICHKX's -2.77% return.
CHILX
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- -5.75%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 23.88%
- 3Y*
- 6.30%
- 5Y*
- -0.62%
- 10Y*
- —
ICHKX
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -5.95%
- YTD
- -2.77%
- 6M
- -3.81%
- 1Y
- 13.55%
- 3Y*
- 1.41%
- 5Y*
- -6.79%
- 10Y*
- 4.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CHILX vs. ICHKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHILX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than ICHKX's 1.71% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CHILX vs. ICHKX — Risk / Return Rank
CHILX
ICHKX
CHILX vs. ICHKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX) and Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund (ICHKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHILX | ICHKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.33 | 0.73 | +0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.77 | 1.06 | +0.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.15 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 0.96 | +0.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.17 | 3.99 | +3.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHILX | ICHKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 0.73 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | -0.29 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.19 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between CHILX and ICHKX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CHILX vs. ICHKX - Dividend Comparison
CHILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, more than ICHKX's 1.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHILX BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund | 2.93% | 2.94% | 2.11% | 2.02% | 0.92% | 1.19% | 3.64% | 12.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ICHKX Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund | 1.09% | 1.06% | 1.11% | 0.74% | 0.86% | 20.44% | 3.57% | 4.37% | 12.53% | 6.76% | 5.31% | 12.25% |
Drawdowns
CHILX vs. ICHKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHILX drawdown since its inception was -47.73%, smaller than the maximum ICHKX drawdown of -70.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHILX and ICHKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHILX | ICHKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.73% | -70.67% | +22.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.51% | -14.00% | +2.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.95% | -53.67% | +9.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -58.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.23% | -38.13% | +21.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.75% | -27.16% | +6.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 3.37% | -0.23% |
Volatility
CHILX vs. ICHKX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX) and Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund (ICHKX) have volatilities of 5.77% and 5.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CHILX | ICHKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.77% | 5.50% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.32% | 11.19% | +0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.24% | 18.63% | -1.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 23.71% | -3.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.87% | 22.40% | -0.53% |