CHGG vs. CBT
CHGG (Chegg, Inc.) and CBT (Cabot Corporation) are both stocks. CHGG operates in Education & Training Services (Consumer Defensive), while CBT operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, CHGG returned -12.21%/yr vs 9.16%/yr for CBT. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CHGG vs. CBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHGG achieves a 44.09% return, which is significantly higher than CBT's 33.22% return. Over the past 10 years, CHGG has underperformed CBT with an annualized return of -12.21%, while CBT has yielded a comparatively higher 9.16% annualized return.
CHGG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 19.64%
- YTD
- 44.09%
- 6M
- 41.87%
- 1Y
- 11.67%
- 3Y*
- -48.14%
- 5Y*
- -55.15%
- 10Y*
- -12.21%
CBT
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 13.50%
- YTD
- 33.22%
- 6M
- 38.07%
- 1Y
- 20.78%
- 3Y*
- 7.58%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- 9.16%
CHGG vs. CBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHGG Chegg, Inc. | 44.09% | -42.24% | -85.83% | -55.05% | -17.69% | -66.01% | 138.27% | 33.39% | 74.14% | 121.14% |
CBT Cabot Corporation | 33.22% | -25.68% | 11.25% | 27.63% | 21.38% | 28.40% | -2.16% | 14.25% | -28.70% | 24.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHGG and CBT is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2013 | 0.24 |
Fundamentals
CHGG:
-$0.79
CBT:
$5.83
CHGG:
0.46
CBT:
1.29
CHGG:
$318.78M
CBT:
$3.61B
CHGG:
$197.33M
CBT:
$916.00M
CHGG:
-$1.81M
CBT:
$773.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHGG vs. CBT — Risk / Return Rank
CHGG
CBT
CHGG vs. CBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) and Cabot Corporation (CBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHGG | CBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.10 | 0.66 | -0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 1.23 | -0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.14 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 0.68 | -0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.73 | 1.64 | -0.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHGG | CBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 | 0.66 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.63 | 0.26 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.17 | 0.26 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.22 | 0.22 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
CHGG vs. CBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHGG drawdown since its inception was -99.60%, which is greater than CBT's maximum drawdown of -82.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHGG and CBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHGG | CBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.60% | -82.87% | -16.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.54% | -28.82% | -46.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.06% | -48.78% | -47.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.50% | -48.78% | -50.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.60% | -67.20% | -32.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.82% | -22.42% | -76.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.33% | -20.82% | -24.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.00% | 12.03% | +30.97% |
Volatility
CHGG vs. CBT - Volatility Comparison
Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) has a higher volatility of 44.66% compared to Cabot Corporation (CBT) at 11.97%. This indicates that CHGG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHGG | CBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 44.66% | 11.97% | +32.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 78.49% | 22.21% | +56.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 120.36% | 31.89% | +88.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.12% | 33.54% | +54.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.71% | 35.33% | +35.38% |
Dividends
CHGG vs. CBT - Dividend Comparison
CHGG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBT Cabot Corporation | 2.09% | 2.69% | 1.85% | 1.88% | 2.21% | 2.53% | 3.12% | 2.90% | 3.04% | 2.02% | 2.22% | 2.15% |
CHGG Chegg, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CHGG vs. CBT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chegg, Inc. and Cabot Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CHGG vs. CBT - Profitability Comparison
CHGG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chegg, Inc. reported a gross profit of 37.89M and revenue of 63.26M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.9%.
CBT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cabot Corporation reported a gross profit of 211.00M and revenue of 849.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.9%.
CHGG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chegg, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.04M and revenue of 63.26M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.6%.
CBT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cabot Corporation reported an operating income of 129.00M and revenue of 849.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.2%.
CHGG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chegg, Inc. reported a net income of 228.00K and revenue of 63.26M, resulting in a net margin of 0.4%.
CBT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cabot Corporation reported a net income of 73.00M and revenue of 849.00M, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CHGG and CBT have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHGG has higher volatility (44.66%) compared to CBT (11.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHGG dropped -99.60% vs CBT's -82.87%.
CBT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHGG and CBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer