CHGG vs. LRN
CHGG (Chegg, Inc.) and LRN (Stride, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Education & Training Services industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. Over the past 10 years, CHGG returned -12.96%/yr vs 23.78%/yr for LRN. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CHGG vs. LRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHGG achieves a 32.26% return, which is significantly lower than LRN's 53.44% return. Over the past 10 years, CHGG has underperformed LRN with an annualized return of -12.96%, while LRN has yielded a comparatively higher 23.78% annualized return.
CHGG
- 1D
- -8.21%
- 1M
- 6.96%
- YTD
- 32.26%
- 6M
- 35.52%
- 1Y
- 1.65%
- 3Y*
- -49.60%
- 5Y*
- -55.78%
- 10Y*
- -12.96%
LRN
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- 7.99%
- YTD
- 53.44%
- 6M
- 62.77%
- 1Y
- -30.11%
- 3Y*
- 33.48%
- 5Y*
- 28.19%
- 10Y*
- 23.78%
CHGG vs. LRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHGG Chegg, Inc. | 32.26% | -42.24% | -85.83% | -55.05% | -17.69% | -66.01% | 138.27% | 33.39% | 74.14% | 121.14% |
LRN Stride, Inc. | 53.44% | -37.53% | 75.05% | 89.80% | -6.15% | 56.99% | 4.32% | -17.91% | 55.91% | -7.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHGG and LRN is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2013 | 0.27 |
Fundamentals
CHGG:
$137.92M
LRN:
$4.74B
CHGG:
-$0.79
LRN:
$9.68
CHGG:
0.42
LRN:
1.90
CHGG:
1.14
LRN:
2.89
CHGG:
$318.78M
LRN:
$2.54B
CHGG:
$197.33M
LRN:
$972.24M
CHGG:
-$1.81M
LRN:
$424.60M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHGG vs. LRN — Risk / Return Rank
CHGG
LRN
CHGG vs. LRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) and Stride, Inc. (LRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHGG | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.98 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.02 | -0.47 | +0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.04 | -0.73 | +0.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHGG | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 | -0.45 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.63 | 0.55 | -1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.18 | 0.48 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.22 | 0.15 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
CHGG vs. LRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHGG drawdown since its inception was -99.60%, which is greater than LRN's maximum drawdown of -81.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHGG and LRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHGG | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.60% | -81.41% | -18.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.54% | -64.07% | -11.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.06% | -64.07% | -31.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.50% | -64.07% | -35.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.60% | -64.07% | -35.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.92% | -41.33% | -57.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.34% | -36.27% | -9.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.05% | 41.53% | +1.52% |
Volatility
CHGG vs. LRN - Volatility Comparison
Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) has a higher volatility of 45.59% compared to Stride, Inc. (LRN) at 7.85%. This indicates that CHGG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHGG | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 45.59% | 7.85% | +37.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 78.31% | 23.81% | +54.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 119.41% | 67.31% | +52.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.18% | 51.38% | +36.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.74% | 49.23% | +21.51% |
Dividends
CHGG vs. LRN - Dividend Comparison
Neither CHGG nor LRN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CHGG vs. LRN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chegg, Inc. and Stride, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CHGG vs. LRN - Profitability Comparison
CHGG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chegg, Inc. reported a gross profit of 37.89M and revenue of 63.26M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.9%.
LRN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a gross profit of 231.56M and revenue of 629.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
CHGG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chegg, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.04M and revenue of 63.26M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.6%.
LRN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported an operating income of 129.08M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.
CHGG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chegg, Inc. reported a net income of 228.00K and revenue of 63.26M, resulting in a net margin of 0.4%.
LRN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a net income of 248.49M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in a net margin of 39.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CHGG and LRN have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHGG has higher volatility (45.59%) compared to LRN (7.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHGG dropped -99.60% vs LRN's -81.41%.
CHGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.01 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHGG and LRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer