CHGG vs. LRN

In the year-to-date period, CHGG achieves a -11.18% return, which is significantly lower than LRN's 29.16% return. Over the past 10 years, CHGG has underperformed LRN with an annualized return of -16.46%, while LRN has yielded a comparatively higher 22.80% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) and Stride, Inc. (LRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CHGG Sharpe Ratio is -1.02, which is lower than the LRN Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHGG and LRN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither CHGG nor LRN has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum CHGG drawdown since its inception was -98.78%, which is greater than LRN's maximum drawdown of -81.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHGG and LRN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) has a higher volatility of 21.25% compared to Stride, Inc. (LRN) at 9.58%. This indicates that CHGG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chegg, Inc. and Stride, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.