PortfoliosLab logo
CHGG vs. MSFT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CHGG and MSFT is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CHGG vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CHGG:

-0.72

MSFT:

0.48

Sortino Ratio

CHGG:

-0.91

MSFT:

0.66

Omega Ratio

CHGG:

0.89

MSFT:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

CHGG:

-0.68

MSFT:

0.36

Martin Ratio

CHGG:

-1.16

MSFT:

0.79

Ulcer Index

CHGG:

58.05%

MSFT:

10.69%

Daily Std Dev

CHGG:

96.38%

MSFT:

25.62%

Max Drawdown

CHGG:

-99.59%

MSFT:

-69.39%

Current Drawdown

CHGG:

-98.94%

MSFT:

-0.44%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CHGG:

$127.88M

MSFT:

$3.43T

EPS

CHGG:

-$8.26

MSFT:

$12.94

PEG Ratio

CHGG:

0.12

MSFT:

2.17

PS Ratio

CHGG:

0.23

MSFT:

12.72

PB Ratio

CHGG:

0.59

MSFT:

10.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

CHGG:

$564.61M

MSFT:

$270.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CHGG:

$376.21M

MSFT:

$186.51B

EBITDA (TTM)

CHGG:

-$664.41M

MSFT:

$150.06B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHGG achieves a -25.47% return, which is significantly lower than MSFT's 10.02% return. Over the past 10 years, CHGG has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of -17.16%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 27.72% annualized return.


CHGG

YTD

-25.47%

1M

57.89%

6M

-49.37%

1Y

-68.67%

3Y*

-61.57%

5Y*

-54.48%

10Y*

-17.16%

MSFT

YTD

10.02%

1M

6.33%

6M

7.60%

1Y

12.14%

3Y*

20.61%

5Y*

21.07%

10Y*

27.72%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Chegg, Inc.

Microsoft Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CHGG vs. MSFT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHGG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CHGG is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CHGG is 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CHGG is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CHGG is 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CHGG is 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CHGG is 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MSFT is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MSFT is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MSFT is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MSFT is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MSFT is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MSFT is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CHGG vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CHGG Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is lower than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHGG and MSFT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CHGG vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

CHGG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CHGG
Chegg, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%2.48%

Drawdowns

CHGG vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHGG drawdown since its inception was -99.59%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHGG and MSFT.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CHGG vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) has a higher volatility of 28.84% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 4.60%. This indicates that CHGG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CHGG vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chegg, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20212022202320242025
121.39M
70.07B
(CHGG) Total Revenue
(MSFT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CHGG vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Chegg, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%75.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
55.5%
68.7%
(CHGG) Gross Margin
(MSFT) Gross Margin
CHGG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Chegg, Inc. reported a gross profit of 67.41M and revenue of 121.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.5%.

MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 48.15B and revenue of 70.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.7%.

CHGG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Chegg, Inc. reported an operating income of -29.00M and revenue of 121.39M, resulting in an operating margin of -23.9%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 32.00B and revenue of 70.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.7%.

CHGG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Chegg, Inc. reported a net income of -17.48M and revenue of 121.39M, resulting in a net margin of -14.4%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 25.82B and revenue of 70.07B, resulting in a net margin of 36.9%.