PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGXU vs. IFLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGXU vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CGXU having a 17.53% return and IFLO slightly lower at 16.93%.


CGXU

1D
1.46%
1M
0.49%
YTD
17.53%
6M
17.66%
1Y
36.60%
3Y*
17.19%
5Y*
10Y*

IFLO

1D
0.43%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
16.93%
6M
16.46%
1Y
32.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGXU vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CGXU and IFLO is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.80

CGXU vs. IFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CGXU
IFLO

Technology

22.1%
21.5%

Basic Materials

15.4%
11.3%

Industrials

14.4%
18.1%

Communication Services

12.4%
6.7%

Financial Services

11.3%
1.1%

Energy

7.1%
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
13.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
2.8%

Healthcare

4.0%
11.7%

Utilities

1.8%
1.0%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Technology

CGXU
22.1%
IFLO
21.5%

Basic Materials

CGXU
15.4%
IFLO
11.3%

Industrials

CGXU
14.4%
IFLO
18.1%

Communication Services

CGXU
12.4%
IFLO
6.7%

Financial Services

CGXU
11.3%
IFLO
1.1%

Energy

CGXU
7.1%
IFLO
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

CGXU
7.0%
IFLO
13.8%

Consumer Defensive

CGXU
4.5%
IFLO
2.8%

Healthcare

CGXU
4.0%
IFLO
11.7%

Utilities

CGXU
1.8%
IFLO
1.0%

Real Estate

CGXU

-

IFLO
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGXU vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGXU
CGXU Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
CGXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGXU Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
CGXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGXU Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

IFLO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGXU vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CGXUIFLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.07

CGXU vs. IFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CGXU vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGXU drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGXU and IFLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGXUIFLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.64%

-6.44%

-19.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.14%

-6.44%

-6.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.80%

-3.37%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.60%

-1.25%

-5.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.64%

Volatility

CGXU vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGXUIFLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.69%

14.75%

+6.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.33%

14.75%

+5.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.33%

14.75%

+5.58%

CGXU vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGXU has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGXU vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison

CGXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than IFLO's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CGXU
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF
4.51%5.31%1.01%0.99%0.95%
IFLO
VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF
1.51%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGXU and IFLO have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On 1-year performance, CGXU leads with 36.60% vs 32.28% for IFLO. On fees, CGXU is cheaper at 0.54% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CGXU has performed better with a 36.60% return vs 32.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CGXU is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IFLO.

CGXU has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 1.51% for IFLO.

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for CGXU and 0.56% for IFLO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGXU and IFLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer