PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGXU vs. IDEV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGXU vs. IDEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGXU achieves a 19.90% return, which is significantly higher than IDEV's 8.92% return.


CGXU

1D
-1.14%
1M
10.58%
YTD
19.90%
6M
22.54%
1Y
41.14%
3Y*
18.00%
5Y*
10Y*

IDEV

1D
-0.90%
1M
3.23%
YTD
8.92%
6M
11.57%
1Y
23.20%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
8.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGXU vs. IDEV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CGXU
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF
19.90%26.31%4.36%15.75%-14.34%
IDEV
iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF
8.92%32.56%4.54%17.36%-8.07%

Correlation

The correlation between CGXU and IDEV is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022

0.92

The correlation between CGXU and IDEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

CGXU vs. IDEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CGXU
IDEV

Technology

21.6%
9.9%

Industrials

15.4%
19.1%

Financial Services

13.9%
24.2%

Basic Materials

11.0%
8.0%

Communication Services

10.5%
4.0%

Energy

7.5%
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

6.2%
6.0%

Healthcare

4.7%
8.6%

Utilities

2.5%
3.7%

Real Estate

-

2.9%

Technology

CGXU
21.6%
IDEV
9.9%

Industrials

CGXU
15.4%
IDEV
19.1%

Financial Services

CGXU
13.9%
IDEV
24.2%

Basic Materials

CGXU
11.0%
IDEV
8.0%

Communication Services

CGXU
10.5%
IDEV
4.0%

Energy

CGXU
7.5%
IDEV
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

CGXU
6.6%
IDEV
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

CGXU
6.2%
IDEV
6.0%

Healthcare

CGXU
4.7%
IDEV
8.6%

Utilities

CGXU
2.5%
IDEV
3.7%

Real Estate

CGXU

-

IDEV
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGXU vs. IDEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGXU
CGXU Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
CGXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGXU Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CGXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGXU Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

IDEV
IDEV Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
IDEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDEV Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
IDEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDEV Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGXU vs. IDEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGXUIDEVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.29

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

2.08

+1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.72

8.16

+3.56

CGXU vs. IDEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGXU Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the IDEV Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGXU and IDEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGXUIDEVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

1.61

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.55

+0.01

Drawdowns

CGXU vs. IDEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGXU drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, smaller than the maximum IDEV drawdown of -34.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGXU and IDEV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGXUIDEVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.64%

-34.77%

+9.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.14%

-11.20%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.63%

-13.41%

-8.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

-0.98%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.66%

-6.57%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

2.85%

+0.67%

Volatility

CGXU vs. IDEV - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) has a higher volatility of 7.31% compared to iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) at 4.60%. This indicates that CGXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGXUIDEVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.31%

4.60%

+2.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.05%

12.10%

+4.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.83%

14.51%

+5.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.93%

16.26%

+3.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.93%

17.27%

+2.66%

CGXU vs. IDEV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGXU has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than IDEV's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGXU vs. IDEV - Dividend Comparison

CGXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than IDEV's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CGXU
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF
4.43%5.31%1.01%0.99%0.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IDEV
iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF
3.13%3.40%3.30%3.07%2.69%3.05%2.00%3.18%3.16%1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGXU and IDEV have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGXU has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to IDEV (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGXU dropped -25.64% vs IDEV's -34.77%.

On 3-year performance, CGXU leads with 18.00% vs 17.40% for IDEV. On fees, IDEV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IDEV has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CGXU has performed better with a 18.00% return vs 17.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDEV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for CGXU.

CGXU has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 3.13% for IDEV.

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for CGXU and 0.05% for IDEV.

CGXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGXU and IDEV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer