CGXU vs. BINV

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) and Brandes International ETF (BINV).

CGXU and BINV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CGXU is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Feb 22, 2022. BINV is an actively managed fund by Brandes. It was launched on Oct 3, 2023.

Performance

CGXU vs. BINV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) and Brandes International ETF (BINV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CGXU vs. BINV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CGXU Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF	1.08%	26.31%	4.36%	12.20%
BINV Brandes International ETF	3.47%	37.84%	7.71%	12.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGXU achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly lower than BINV's 3.47% return.

CGXU

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: -5.62%
• YTD: 1.08%
• 6M: 4.45%
• 1Y: 27.62%
• 3Y*: 11.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BINV

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: -4.67%
• YTD: 3.47%
• 6M: 8.31%
• 1Y: 28.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGXU vs. BINV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGXU has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than BINV's 0.70% expense ratio.

BINV

Brandes International ETF

CGXU

Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF

Return for Risk

CGXU vs. BINV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGXU

CGXU Risk / Return Rank: 70
CGXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
CGXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
CGXU Omega Ratio Rank: 67
CGXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
CGXU Martin Ratio Rank: 70

BINV

BINV Risk / Return Rank: 83
BINV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
BINV Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
BINV Omega Ratio Rank: 83
BINV Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
BINV Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGXU vs. BINV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) and Brandes International ETF (BINV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGXU	BINV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.28	1.67	-0.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	2.35	-0.54
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.34	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.15	2.50	-0.35
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.65	9.74	-2.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGXU vs. BINV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGXU Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the BINV Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGXU and BINV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGXU	BINV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.28	1.67	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	1.69	-1.33

Correlation

The correlation between CGXU and BINV is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

CGXU vs. BINV - Dividend Comparison

CGXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.25%, more than BINV's 2.12% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGXU Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF	5.25%	5.31%	1.01%	0.99%	0.95%
BINV Brandes International ETF	2.12%	2.23%	2.40%	0.28%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CGXU vs. BINV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGXU drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, which is greater than BINV's maximum drawdown of -14.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGXU and BINV.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGXU	BINV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.64%	-14.91%	-10.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.34%	-11.50%	-1.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.26%	-7.08%	-1.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.85%	-2.29%	-4.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.75%	2.95%	+0.80%

Volatility

CGXU vs. BINV - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) has a higher volatility of 9.98% compared to Brandes International ETF (BINV) at 6.20%. This indicates that CGXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BINV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGXU	BINV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.98%	6.20%	+3.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.62%	10.08%	+5.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.72%	17.39%	+4.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.68%	14.68%	+5.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.68%	14.68%	+5.00%