BINV vs. CGIE

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

BINV (Brandes International ETF) and CGIE (Capital Group International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BINV returned 29.15% vs 18.33% for CGIE. Their correlation of 0.80 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BINV charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for CGIE.

Performance

BINV vs. CGIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brandes International ETF (BINV) and Capital Group International Equity ETF (CGIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BINV achieves a 13.89% return, which is significantly higher than CGIE's 7.72% return.

BINV

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 5.72%
• 6M: 8.44%
• YTD: 13.89%
• 1Y: 29.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 25.67%

CGIE

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 0.80%
• 6M: 2.91%
• YTD: 7.72%
• 1Y: 18.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BINV Brandes International ETF	$1.64M	$1.62M	$1.73M
CGIE Capital Group International Equity ETF	$15.47M	$15.73M	$16.72M

BINV vs. CGIE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BINV Brandes International ETF	13.89%	37.84%	7.71%	12.86%
CGIE Capital Group International Equity ETF	7.72%	28.11%	0.72%	13.12%

Correlation

The correlation between BINV and CGIE is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2023	0.80

The correlation between BINV and CGIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

BINV vs. CGIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BINV	CGIE
Consumer Defensive	26.1%	6.9%
Healthcare	16.9%	7.2%
Consumer Cyclical	14.0%	3.1%
Industrials	9.9%	25.7%
Technology	9.5%	21.9%
Financial Services	7.8%	20.2%
Communication Services	5.5%	2.4%
Basic Materials	4.4%	3.5%
Energy	2.6%	2.6%
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Utilities	1.4%	6.5%

Return for Risk

BINV vs. CGIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BINV

BINV Risk / Return Rank: 78
BINV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
BINV Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
BINV Omega Ratio Rank: 84
BINV Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
BINV Martin Ratio Rank: 65

CGIE

CGIE Risk / Return Rank: 43
CGIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
CGIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
CGIE Omega Ratio Rank: 40
CGIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
CGIE Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BINV vs. CGIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes International ETF (BINV) and Capital Group International Equity ETF (CGIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BINV	CGIE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	1.08	+1.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	1.60	+1.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.20	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.55	1.54	+1.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.26	5.71	+2.55

BINV vs. CGIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BINV Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the CGIE Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BINV and CGIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BINV vs. CGIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BINV drawdown since its inception was -14.91%, which is greater than CGIE's maximum drawdown of -13.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINV and CGIE.

Drawdown Indicators

	BINV	CGIE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.91%	-13.82%	-1.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.50%	-11.94%	+0.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.52%	+0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.47%	-2.52%	+0.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.54%	3.22%	+0.32%

Volatility

BINV vs. CGIE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brandes International ETF (BINV) is 3.59%, while Capital Group International Equity ETF (CGIE) has a volatility of 5.02%. This indicates that BINV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BINV	CGIE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.59%	5.02%	-1.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.53%	14.89%	-3.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.81%	17.10%	-3.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.67%	15.74%	-1.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.67%	15.74%	-1.07%

BINV vs. CGIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BINV has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CGIE's 0.54% expense ratio.

Dividends

BINV vs. CGIE - Dividend Comparison

BINV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than CGIE's 1.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BINV Brandes International ETF	2.08%	2.23%	2.40%	0.28%
CGIE Capital Group International Equity ETF	1.35%	1.17%	1.27%	0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BINV and CGIE in my portfolio?

BINV and CGIE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BINV or CGIE?

CGIE has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to BINV (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BINV dropped -14.91% vs CGIE's -13.82%.

Which ETF is better, BINV or CGIE?

On 1-year performance, BINV leads with 29.15% vs 18.33% for CGIE. On fees, CGIE is cheaper at 0.54% per year. On volatility, BINV has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BINV or CGIE?

Over the 1-year period, BINV has performed better with a 29.15% return vs 18.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BINV or CGIE?

CGIE is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BINV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BINV or CGIE?

BINV has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 1.35% for CGIE.

What is the main difference between BINV and CGIE?

They also come from different issuers: Brandes and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BINV and 0.54% for CGIE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BINV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.