CGW vs. DBO
CGW (Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - CGW is a Water Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Water Index, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CGW returned 9.92%/yr vs 11.43%/yr for DBO. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CGW charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
CGW vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGW achieves a 3.58% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 66.72% return. Over the past 10 years, CGW has underperformed DBO with an annualized return of 9.92%, while DBO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.43% annualized return.
CGW
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- 6M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- 3.58%
- 1Y
- 6.44%
- 3Y*
- 10.27%
- 5Y*
- 4.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.92%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.28%
DBO
- 1D
- -5.53%
- 1M
- 17.71%
- 6M
- 53.16%
- YTD
- 66.72%
- 1Y
- 51.44%
- 3Y*
- 12.33%
- 5Y*
- 13.64%
- 10Y*
- 11.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.71M | $1.82M | $1.98M | |
| $11.34M | $10.71M | $13.49M |
CGW vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGW Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF | 3.58% | 18.10% | 4.55% | 15.50% | -22.00% | 31.70% | 15.41% | 34.04% | -10.47% | 27.08% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 66.72% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | 60.74% | -20.99% | 28.05% | -15.22% | 4.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGW and DBO is -0.40, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2007 | 0.26 |
The correlation between CGW and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.40 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGW vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
CGW
DBO
CGW vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGW | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.23 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | 1.86 | -1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.33 | 5.64 | -4.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGW vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGW drawdown since its inception was -57.24%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGW and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGW | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.24% | -90.18% | +32.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.86% | -27.73% | +16.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.19% | -28.20% | +14.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.74% | -37.68% | +4.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.72% | -61.69% | +25.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.21% | -56.13% | +50.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.81% | -62.20% | +52.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.85% | 9.16% | -4.31% |
Volatility
CGW vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) is 3.99%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 18.99%. This indicates that CGW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGW | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.99% | 18.99% | -15.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.79% | 34.30% | -23.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.90% | 38.86% | -24.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 33.43% | -16.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.62% | 32.24% | -14.62% |
CGW vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGW has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGW vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
CGW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than DBO's 2.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGW Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF | 1.53% | 1.58% | 2.27% | 1.55% | 1.45% | 1.59% | 1.41% | 1.48% | 2.14% | 1.71% | 1.65% | 1.67% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 2.11% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGW and DBO have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (18.99%) compared to CGW (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGW dropped -57.24% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 10-year performance, DBO leads with 11.43% vs 9.92% for CGW. On fees, CGW is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, CGW has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DBO has performed better with a 11.43% return vs 9.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CGW is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
DBO has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 1.53% for CGW.
CGW is categorized as Water Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. CGW tracks S&P Global Water Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for CGW and 0.78% for DBO.
DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGW and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer