CGRO vs. ASHS

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

CGRO (CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF) and ASHS (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF) are both China Equities funds. CGRO is actively managed, while ASHS is passively managed. Over the past year, CGRO returned -12.21% vs 32.44% for ASHS. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CGRO charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ASHS.

Performance

CGRO vs. ASHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGRO achieves a -12.97% return, which is significantly lower than ASHS's 7.44% return.

CGRO

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: 12.95%
• 6M: -10.76%
• YTD: -12.97%
• 1Y: -12.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.45%

ASHS

• 1D: 3.03%
• 1M: -10.11%
• 6M: -2.62%
• YTD: 7.44%
• 1Y: 32.44%
• 3Y*: 10.95%
• 5Y*: 2.04%
• 10Y*: 2.52%
• ALL TIME*: 5.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF	$288.80K	$572.63K	$589.32K
CGRO CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF	$6.01K	$9.52K	$35.25K

CGRO vs. ASHS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CGRO CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF	-12.97%	20.23%	14.75%	1.84%
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF	7.44%	39.48%	2.68%	-1.09%

Correlation

The correlation between CGRO and ASHS is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2023	0.60

The correlation between CGRO and ASHS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

CGRO vs. ASHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CGRO	ASHS
Consumer Cyclical	42.4%	5.4%
Industrials	16.4%	16.8%
Communication Services	15.0%	1.1%
Technology	12.8%	31.6%
Healthcare	7.4%	7.8%
Financial Services	2.9%	6.4%
Consumer Defensive	2.0%	1.9%
Real Estate	1.1%	0.6%
Basic Materials	-	16.8%
Energy	-	2.4%
Utilities	-	2.5%

Return for Risk

CGRO vs. ASHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CGRO

CGRO Risk / Return Rank: 5
CGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
CGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
CGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 5
CGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
CGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 6

ASHS

ASHS Risk / Return Rank: 43
ASHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
ASHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
ASHS Omega Ratio Rank: 40
ASHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
ASHS Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CGRO vs. ASHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGRO	ASHS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.53	1.22	-1.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.63	1.75	-2.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.21	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.34	1.87	-2.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.63	5.49	-6.12

CGRO vs. ASHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGRO Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the ASHS Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGRO and ASHS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CGRO vs. ASHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGRO drawdown since its inception was -36.53%, smaller than the maximum ASHS drawdown of -69.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGRO and ASHS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGRO	ASHS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.53%	-69.90%	+33.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.53%	-17.46%	-19.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.13%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-47.81%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.62%	-37.99%	+12.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.47%	-48.36%	+36.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.35%	5.93%	+13.42%

Volatility

CGRO vs. ASHS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO) is 6.15%, while Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) has a volatility of 12.42%. This indicates that CGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGRO	ASHS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.15%	12.42%	-6.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.63%	21.26%	-4.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.09%	26.74%	-3.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.67%	27.14%	+1.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.67%	25.88%	+2.79%

CGRO vs. ASHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGRO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ASHS's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGRO vs. ASHS - Dividend Comparison

CGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, while ASHS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.69%	0.65%	1.90%	0.76%	0.43%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	8.34%
CGRO CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF	3.22%	2.48%	2.47%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGRO and ASHS in my portfolio?

CGRO and ASHS have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGRO or ASHS?

ASHS has higher volatility (12.42%) compared to CGRO (6.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGRO dropped -36.53% vs ASHS's -69.90%.

Which ETF is better, CGRO or ASHS?

On 1-year performance, ASHS leads with 32.44% vs -12.21% for CGRO. On fees, ASHS is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, CGRO has been the lower-risk option at 6.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGRO or ASHS?

Over the 1-year period, ASHS has performed better with a 32.44% return vs -12.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGRO or ASHS?

ASHS is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CGRO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGRO or ASHS?

CGRO has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 0.00% for ASHS.

What is the main difference between CGRO and ASHS?

They also come from different issuers: CoreValues and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CGRO and 0.65% for ASHS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.