CGMU vs. CGDG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CGMU (Capital Group Municipal Income ETF) and CGDG (Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGMU is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Capital Group, while CGDG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CGMU returned 6.75% vs 15.94% for CGDG. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CGMU charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for CGDG.

Performance

CGMU vs. CGDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) and Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGMU achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly lower than CGDG's 5.46% return.

CGMU

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 1.58%
• 6M: 1.97%
• 1Y: 6.75%
• 3Y*: 4.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CGDG

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 0.89%
• YTD: 5.46%
• 6M: 6.21%
• 1Y: 15.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGMU vs. CGDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CGMU Capital Group Municipal Income ETF	1.58%	5.19%	2.64%	6.51%
CGDG Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF	5.46%	22.74%	11.52%	9.54%

Correlation

The correlation between CGMU and CGDG is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2023	0.22

Return for Risk

CGMU vs. CGDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGMU

CGMU Risk / Return Rank: 76
CGMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
CGMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
CGMU Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CGMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
CGMU Martin Ratio Rank: 52

CGDG

CGDG Risk / Return Rank: 44
CGDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
CGDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
CGDG Omega Ratio Rank: 42
CGDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
CGDG Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGMU vs. CGDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) and Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGMU	CGDG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.95	1.51	+1.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.20	2.11	+2.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	1.27	+0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	2.07	+0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.64	8.02	+0.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGMU vs. CGDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGMU Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is higher than the CGDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGMU and CGDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGMU	CGDG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.95	1.51	+1.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.67	1.54	+0.13

Drawdowns

CGMU vs. CGDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGMU drawdown since its inception was -4.11%, smaller than the maximum CGDG drawdown of -10.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGMU and CGDG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGMU	CGDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.11%	-10.52%	+6.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.55%	-7.72%	+5.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.71%	-0.96%	+0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.84%	-1.32%	+0.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.78%	1.99%	-1.21%

Volatility

CGMU vs. CGDG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) is 0.80%, while Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) has a volatility of 3.22%. This indicates that CGMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGMU	CGDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.80%	3.22%	-2.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.73%	8.28%	-6.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.30%	10.63%	-8.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.48%	12.15%	-8.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.48%	12.15%	-8.67%

CGMU vs. CGDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGMU has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than CGDG's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGMU vs. CGDG - Dividend Comparison

CGMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, more than CGDG's 1.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGDG Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF	1.87%	1.95%	2.15%	0.39%	0.00%
CGMU Capital Group Municipal Income ETF	3.33%	3.32%	3.21%	3.08%	0.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGMU and CGDG in my portfolio?

CGMU and CGDG have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGMU or CGDG?

CGDG has higher volatility (3.22%) compared to CGMU (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGMU dropped -4.11% vs CGDG's -10.52%.

Which ETF is better, CGMU or CGDG?

On 1-year performance, CGDG leads with 15.94% vs 6.75% for CGMU. On fees, CGMU is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, CGMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGMU or CGDG?

Over the 1-year period, CGDG has performed better with a 15.94% return vs 6.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGMU or CGDG?

CGMU is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for CGDG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGMU or CGDG?

CGMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 1.87% for CGDG.

What is the main difference between CGMU and CGDG?

CGMU is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while CGDG is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for CGMU and 0.47% for CGDG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.