CGMU vs. CGDG

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) and Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG).

CGMU and CGDG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CGMU is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Oct 25, 2022. CGDG is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Sep 26, 2023.

Performance

CGMU vs. CGDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) and Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CGMU vs. CGDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CGMU Capital Group Municipal Income ETF	0.35%	5.19%	2.64%	6.51%
CGDG Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF	1.66%	22.74%	11.52%	9.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGMU achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than CGDG's 1.66% return.

CGMU

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -1.28%
• YTD: 0.35%
• 6M: 1.80%
• 1Y: 5.02%
• 3Y*: 4.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CGDG

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -1.81%
• YTD: 1.66%
• 6M: 4.53%
• 1Y: 18.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGMU vs. CGDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGMU has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than CGDG's 0.47% expense ratio.

CGDG

Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF

CGMU

Capital Group Municipal Income ETF

Return for Risk

CGMU vs. CGDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGMU

CGMU Risk / Return Rank: 68
CGMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
CGMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
CGMU Omega Ratio Rank: 84
CGMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
CGMU Martin Ratio Rank: 48

CGDG

CGDG Risk / Return Rank: 69
CGDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
CGDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
CGDG Omega Ratio Rank: 69
CGDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
CGDG Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGMU vs. CGDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) and Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGMU	CGDG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	1.31	+0.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	1.87	+0.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.27	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	1.91	-0.22
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.57	8.55	-2.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGMU vs. CGDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGMU Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the CGDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGMU and CGDG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGMU	CGDG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.55	1.31	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.63	1.51	+0.12

Correlation

The correlation between CGMU and CGDG is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CGMU vs. CGDG - Dividend Comparison

CGMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, more than CGDG's 1.94% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGMU Capital Group Municipal Income ETF	3.37%	3.32%	3.21%	3.08%	0.49%
CGDG Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF	1.94%	1.95%	2.15%	0.39%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CGMU vs. CGDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGMU drawdown since its inception was -4.11%, smaller than the maximum CGDG drawdown of -10.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGMU and CGDG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGMU	CGDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.11%	-10.52%	+6.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.86%	-8.04%	+5.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.91%	-4.53%	+2.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.82%	-1.29%	+0.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.87%	2.21%	-1.34%

Volatility

CGMU vs. CGDG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) is 1.11%, while Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that CGMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGMU	CGDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.11%	4.62%	-3.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.63%	8.28%	-6.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.26%	14.10%	-10.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.52%	12.21%	-8.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.52%	12.21%	-8.69%