PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CGDG vs. INPAX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CGDG and INPAX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

CGDG vs. INPAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) and American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio (INPAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-4.00%-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
5.27%
3.64%
CGDG
INPAX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CGDG:

1.53

INPAX:

1.82

Sortino Ratio

CGDG:

2.14

INPAX:

2.43

Omega Ratio

CGDG:

1.27

INPAX:

1.34

Calmar Ratio

CGDG:

2.74

INPAX:

2.41

Martin Ratio

CGDG:

7.83

INPAX:

9.05

Ulcer Index

CGDG:

2.05%

INPAX:

1.23%

Daily Std Dev

CGDG:

10.50%

INPAX:

6.15%

Max Drawdown

CGDG:

-5.86%

INPAX:

-21.25%

Current Drawdown

CGDG:

-1.61%

INPAX:

-1.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGDG achieves a 3.10% return, which is significantly higher than INPAX's 2.06% return.


CGDG

YTD

3.10%

1M

2.79%

6M

5.27%

1Y

15.06%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

INPAX

YTD

2.06%

1M

0.81%

6M

3.64%

1Y

10.55%

5Y*

4.11%

10Y*

4.86%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGDG vs. INPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGDG has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than INPAX's 0.33% expense ratio.


CGDG
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF
Expense ratio chart for CGDG: current value at 0.47% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.47%
Expense ratio chart for INPAX: current value at 0.33% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.33%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CGDG vs. INPAX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGDG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CGDG is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CGDG is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CGDG is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CGDG is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CGDG is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CGDG is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

INPAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of INPAX is 8282
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of INPAX is 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of INPAX is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of INPAX is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of INPAX is 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of INPAX is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CGDG vs. INPAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) and American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio (INPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CGDG, currently valued at 1.53, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.531.82
The chart of Sortino ratio for CGDG, currently valued at 2.14, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.142.43
The chart of Omega ratio for CGDG, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market1.002.003.001.271.34
The chart of Calmar ratio for CGDG, currently valued at 2.74, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.742.72
The chart of Martin ratio for CGDG, currently valued at 7.83, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.007.839.05
CGDG
INPAX

The current CGDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the INPAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGDG and INPAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50Oct 06Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27Nov 03Nov 10Nov 17Nov 24DecemberDec 08Dec 15Dec 22Dec 29Jan 05Jan 12Jan 19
1.53
1.82
CGDG
INPAX

Dividends

CGDG vs. INPAX - Dividend Comparison

CGDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than INPAX's 3.86% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CGDG
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF
1.53%1.58%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INPAX
American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio
3.86%3.94%3.91%3.41%2.64%3.52%3.28%3.36%2.84%3.17%5.72%7.01%

Drawdowns

CGDG vs. INPAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGDG drawdown since its inception was -5.86%, smaller than the maximum INPAX drawdown of -21.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGDG and INPAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-1.61%
-1.46%
CGDG
INPAX

Volatility

CGDG vs. INPAX - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) has a higher volatility of 4.38% compared to American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio (INPAX) at 3.00%. This indicates that CGDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
4.38%
3.00%
CGDG
INPAX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab