PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGDG vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGDG vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGDG achieves a 9.03% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 24.36% return.


CGDG

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.14%
6M
5.85%
YTD
9.03%
1Y
18.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.08%

SCHD

1D
0.27%
1M
3.61%
6M
13.71%
YTD
24.36%
1Y
31.89%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
9.66%
10Y*
12.70%
ALL TIME*
13.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$21.42M$21.23M$23.23M
$806.58M$724.91M$690.35M

CGDG vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CGDG
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF
9.03%22.74%11.52%10.17%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
24.36%4.34%11.66%8.88%

Correlation

The correlation between CGDG and SCHD is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023

0.68

The correlation between CGDG and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CGDG vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CGDG
SCHD

Financial Services

20.3%
9.9%

Technology

15.5%
12.7%

Healthcare

10.7%
20.8%

Industrials

10.6%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

10.4%
20.6%

Utilities

8.0%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
7.7%

Energy

6.4%
14.1%

Basic Materials

4.9%
1.2%

Real Estate

3.6%

-

Communication Services

2.3%
6.2%

Financial Services

CGDG
20.3%
SCHD
9.9%

Technology

CGDG
15.5%
SCHD
12.7%

Healthcare

CGDG
10.7%
SCHD
20.8%

Industrials

CGDG
10.6%
SCHD
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

CGDG
10.4%
SCHD
20.6%

Utilities

CGDG
8.0%
SCHD
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

CGDG
7.6%
SCHD
7.7%

Energy

CGDG
6.4%
SCHD
14.1%

Basic Materials

CGDG
4.9%
SCHD
1.2%

Real Estate

CGDG
3.6%
SCHD

-

Communication Services

CGDG
2.3%
SCHD
6.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGDG vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CGDG
CGDG Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CGDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGDG Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
CGDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGDG Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CGDG vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CGDGSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.52

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

6.94

-4.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.55

17.53

-7.98

CGDG vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGDG and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CGDG vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGDG drawdown since its inception was -10.52%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGDG and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGDGSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.52%

-33.37%

+22.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.72%

-4.61%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-0.97%

+0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.28%

-3.29%

+2.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

1.82%

+0.14%

Volatility

CGDG vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) is 2.32%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 3.82%. This indicates that CGDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGDGSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.32%

3.82%

-1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.47%

7.99%

+0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.80%

11.06%

-0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.04%

14.39%

-2.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.04%

16.73%

-4.69%

CGDG vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGDG has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGDG vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

CGDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, less than SCHD's 3.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGDG
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF
2.24%1.95%2.15%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.12%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGDG and SCHD have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHD has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to CGDG (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGDG dropped -10.52% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 1-year performance, SCHD leads with 31.89% vs 18.65% for CGDG. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, CGDG has been the lower-risk option at 2.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 31.89% return vs 18.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for CGDG.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 2.24% for CGDG.

CGDG is categorized as Global Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for CGDG and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGDG and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer