CGIC vs. CGBL

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Capital Group International Core Equity ETF (CGIC) and Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL).

CGIC and CGBL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CGIC is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Jun 25, 2024. CGBL is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Sep 26, 2023.

Performance

CGIC vs. CGBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group International Core Equity ETF (CGIC) and Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CGIC vs. CGBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CGIC Capital Group International Core Equity ETF	3.18%	37.53%	-2.81%
CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF	-1.67%	15.33%	6.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGIC achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly higher than CGBL's -1.67% return.

CGIC

• 1D: 1.21%
• 1M: -5.44%
• YTD: 3.18%
• 6M: 8.49%
• 1Y: 30.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CGBL

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: -4.69%
• YTD: -1.67%
• 6M: 0.29%
• 1Y: 13.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGIC vs. CGBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGIC has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than CGBL's 0.33% expense ratio.

CGIC

Capital Group International Core Equity ETF

CGBL

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF

Return for Risk

CGIC vs. CGBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGIC

CGIC Risk / Return Rank: 86
CGIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
CGIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
CGIC Omega Ratio Rank: 87
CGIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
CGIC Martin Ratio Rank: 86

CGBL

CGBL Risk / Return Rank: 63
CGBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
CGBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
CGBL Omega Ratio Rank: 61
CGBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
CGBL Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGIC vs. CGBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group International Core Equity ETF (CGIC) and Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGIC	CGBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	1.10	+0.68
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	1.64	+0.78
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.23	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.75	1.73	+1.02
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.71	7.00	+3.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGIC vs. CGBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGIC Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the CGBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGIC and CGBL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGIC	CGBL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.79	1.10	+0.68
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.28	1.47	-0.19

Correlation

The correlation between CGIC and CGBL is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

CGIC vs. CGBL - Dividend Comparison

CGIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than CGBL's 2.03% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CGIC Capital Group International Core Equity ETF	1.45%	1.60%	0.68%	0.00%
CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF	2.03%	1.98%	1.92%	0.48%

Drawdowns

CGIC vs. CGBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGIC drawdown since its inception was -13.10%, which is greater than CGBL's maximum drawdown of -11.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGIC and CGBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGIC	CGBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.10%	-11.66%	-1.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.30%	-8.11%	-3.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.34%	-5.26%	-2.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.55%	-1.31%	-1.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.90%	2.00%	+0.90%

Volatility

CGIC vs. CGBL - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group International Core Equity ETF (CGIC) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) at 4.54%. This indicates that CGIC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGIC	CGBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.26%	4.54%	+2.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.34%	7.40%	+3.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.99%	12.41%	+4.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.80%	11.01%	+4.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.80%	11.01%	+4.79%