PortfoliosLab logo
CGBL vs. AOM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CGBL and AOM is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CGBL vs. AOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

CGBL:

8.08%

AOM:

8.35%

Max Drawdown

CGBL:

-0.77%

AOM:

-19.96%

Current Drawdown

CGBL:

-0.26%

AOM:

-0.29%

Returns By Period


CGBL

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

AOM

YTD

2.63%

1M

4.31%

6M

1.24%

1Y

8.04%

5Y*

5.75%

10Y*

4.65%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGBL vs. AOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGBL has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than AOM's 0.25% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CGBL vs. AOM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGBL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CGBL is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CGBL is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CGBL is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CGBL is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CGBL is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CGBL is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

AOM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AOM is 8484
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AOM is 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AOM is 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AOM is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AOM is 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AOM is 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CGBL vs. AOM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

CGBL vs. AOM - Dividend Comparison

CGBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than AOM's 3.09% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CGBL
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
1.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AOM
iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF
3.09%3.10%2.79%2.27%1.56%2.02%2.66%2.53%3.31%2.14%1.98%2.08%

Drawdowns

CGBL vs. AOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGBL drawdown since its inception was -0.77%, smaller than the maximum AOM drawdown of -19.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGBL and AOM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CGBL vs. AOM - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...