CGBL vs. FIBR
Compare and contrast key facts about Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) and iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF (FIBR).
CGBL and FIBR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CGBL is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Sep 26, 2023. FIBR is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Index. It was launched on Feb 24, 2015.
Performance
CGBL vs. FIBR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CGBL vs. FIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF | -1.67% | 15.33% | 16.64% | 9.80% |
FIBR iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF | -0.06% | 8.32% | 6.04% | 6.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGBL achieves a -1.67% return, which is significantly lower than FIBR's -0.06% return.
CGBL
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- -1.67%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 13.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIBR
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- YTD
- -0.06%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 6.41%
- 3Y*
- 6.55%
- 5Y*
- 1.68%
- 10Y*
- 2.49%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CGBL vs. FIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGBL has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than FIBR's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CGBL vs. FIBR — Risk / Return Rank
CGBL
FIBR
CGBL vs. FIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) and iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF (FIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGBL | FIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.10 | 1.66 | -0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.64 | 2.39 | -0.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.31 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 2.28 | -0.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.00 | 9.21 | -2.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGBL | FIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 1.66 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.47 | 0.50 | +0.96 |
Correlation
The correlation between CGBL and FIBR is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CGBL vs. FIBR - Dividend Comparison
CGBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than FIBR's 4.65% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF | 2.03% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FIBR iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF | 4.65% | 4.78% | 5.04% | 4.44% | 3.27% | 1.92% | 2.57% | 3.27% | 3.61% | 2.74% | 2.92% | 2.26% |
Drawdowns
CGBL vs. FIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGBL drawdown since its inception was -11.66%, smaller than the maximum FIBR drawdown of -18.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGBL and FIBR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGBL | FIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.66% | -18.47% | +6.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.11% | -2.84% | -5.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.26% | -1.91% | -3.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.31% | -3.30% | +1.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 0.70% | +1.30% |
Volatility
CGBL vs. FIBR - Volatility Comparison
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF (FIBR) at 1.91%. This indicates that CGBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CGBL | FIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 1.91% | +2.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.40% | 2.96% | +4.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.41% | 3.87% | +8.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.01% | 5.59% | +5.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.01% | 4.93% | +6.08% |