PortfoliosLab logo
CGBL vs. FIBR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CGBL and FIBR is -0.80. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

CGBL vs. FIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) and iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Factor ETF (FIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

CGBL:

8.08%

FIBR:

2.12%

Max Drawdown

CGBL:

-0.77%

FIBR:

-0.16%

Current Drawdown

CGBL:

-0.26%

FIBR:

-0.14%

Returns By Period


CGBL

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FIBR

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGBL vs. FIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGBL has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than FIBR's 0.25% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CGBL vs. FIBR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGBL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CGBL is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CGBL is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CGBL is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CGBL is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CGBL is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CGBL is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FIBR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FIBR is 9494
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FIBR is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FIBR is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FIBR is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FIBR is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FIBR is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CGBL vs. FIBR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) and iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Factor ETF (FIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

CGBL vs. FIBR - Dividend Comparison

CGBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than FIBR's 5.20% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGBL
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
1.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FIBR
iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Factor ETF
5.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CGBL vs. FIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGBL drawdown since its inception was -0.77%, which is greater than FIBR's maximum drawdown of -0.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGBL and FIBR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CGBL vs. FIBR - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...